Comments on: Why Isn’t The BlackBerry Bold Available In It’s Biggest Market?

By: isabel

isabel — Mon, 11 May 2009 13:32:58 +0000

WTS New BlackBerry Bold Unlocked $300

( Store Promotional Sales Offer – Buy 2 Units And Get 1 Unit FREE )

Apple Iphone 3G 8GB $260USD
Apple Iphone 8GB $240USD
Apple Iphone 4GB $200USD
Apple iphone 3G 16GB $280

Nokia N96 (16GB) ….$340USD
Nokia E90 …$280USD
Nokia N95 8GB $270USD
NOkia 5800..$250USD

Samsung i900 Omnia 8GB.$260USD
Samsung i900 Omnia 16GB.$280USD

Sony Ericsson C905 $280
Sony Ericsson XPERIA™ X1 Solid Black $300usd

Blackberry Bold 9000 at $300USD
Blackberry Curve 8320 at $220USD
Blackberry 8830 $260USD
Blackberry Storm 9500 Touch Screen at $340USD

Details
Item :BlackBerry Bold
Price :300$
Currency :USD$
Condition : 10/10
Includes :Full box with all accesories

Package Contents
Blackberry bold
Battery
Mains Charger
Software CD
Data Cable
Carry Case

Selling Details
Location :USA
Willing to Ship :Worldwide
Payment Methods :Wire Transfer

C.Isabel Laman
Sales Dept/Marketing.
Company Name:Aloha Telephone Inc
Email: aloha.tel_inc@rocketmail.com
MSN:aloha.tel_inc@live.com
SKYPE:Isabel.laman

By: bluehorseshoe

bluehorseshoe — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:58:35 +0000

I believe that the reason RIM hits GSM first is for the obvious reason…it’s a global standard, thus higher distribution and sales. Based on that reason alone, they crank up the engineering team and move forward with the GSM release first. After it hits the market, they analyze the release and conduct their due diligence on how effective the pre-release marketing was initially (any corrections needed?), review actual sales and forecast distribution. Once all the numbers are in (usually a company would want to see 3-6 months of sales before moving forward on any decisions), they determine if a CDMA model would in fact be worth investing in and releasing. If so, then engineering starts it’s engines once again (although it won’t take as long) and release the CDMA model. Thus the usual 6-12 month lag in time before it’s released on CDMA.

Let’s face it, although CDMA has a strong base here in the states, it’s not global. Furthermore, GSM let’s them seek out the interest level across the board if it’s a good model or not. Considering the popularity of the BB, most models eventually make it to CDMA, but there has been one that I never saw on CDMA (Verizon, Sprint)…7130. Made it’s way to TMO, Cingular and Vodafone. Just didn’t sell. It’s unfortunate that CDMA users take a back seat (myself included), but I can’t argue the logic if that’s the case.

By: Adrock

Adrock — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:46:11 +0000

Of all the people I know and work with across the US (coast to coast), I have yet to speak to someone who is happy with the AT&T service, yet that network gets the good phones first. From what I understand theirs is the largest customer base of the US cell companies, but from what I can gather, they really suck. ‘Everyone’ hates AT&T.
But for the life of me I don’t understand what takes A YEAR for CDMA providers to make a phone work with their towers. It seems like a really poor business model for Verizon and Sprint to wait a year after AT&T gets the Bold. What can be so hard about soldering on a CDMA transmitter and writing some code (they already have the code working for the Curve on CDMA networks.) There is some level of illogic at play in these phone games. I just want my damn Bold on Sprint already.

By: T-Rex

T-Rex — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:02:12 +0000

RIM is very wisely choosing to go with what is called a “ramp-up” release. They are releasing the device in their smaller networks first to give it a shakedown and to work out any kinks in the system before it gets unloaded in their biggest market. Look at the fiasco with the iPhone 3G – released untried and untested to their biggest audience, and plagued by massive problems on the device and the service side (MobileMe, ha! Try MobileFail).

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:37:19 +0000

JonInVA,

be envious that at&t gets the new blackberries first but it does come at a price. Our network is not on par with Verizon.

I switched to AT&T for many reasons unfortunately I don’t know what is going on with them but my reception has been steadily getting worse and I still have a Edge blackberry!

By: LightningMcBerry

LightningMcBerry — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:26:03 +0000

The issue is with AT&T’s greatest strength being it’s greatest weakness.

They have a massive 3G network, that is a patchwork of various implementations.

Through various acquisitions / mergers with companies of disparate sizes, there isn’t a consistent end-to-end implementation of 3G.

So if they deployed now, there would be many areas of intermittent service, no service, or degraded service. That would cause a lot of hardships for their customers, so they’re trying to determine a solution.

Compared to Canada, where the Rogers 3G network is a unified implementation, so performance / reception / reliability is consistent.
Possibly this is the reason the other countries were able to roll out the Bold with relative ease.

By: JonInVA

JonInVA — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:56:21 +0000

This bodes even worse for the Verizon and Sprint customers here in the U.S., like myself. If it’s taking this long for AT&T to get their version to market, the CDMA/EVDO version will arrive sometime in 2010.

Oh how I hate myself for sticking with Verizon. I’m like a battered spouse who just can’t bring myself to leave.

By: SK26

SK26 — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:36:16 +0000

I dont think the BB Bold has come into India yet atleast not by Airtel Vodafone or Reliance the three largest operators…Been waiting to switch from my 8800 as its taken a lot of thrashing in 2 years…Hoping you have some inside information…

By: Sean76

Sean76 — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:27:03 +0000

I think it’s a combo of both at&t and RIM. at&t is famous for screwing up launch dates and such, as well as having problems with there 3G network, same as with there new iphone. And well RIM, they should step in and say something, or do something! I mean after all, at&t is the leading supply source for BlackBerry devices here in the
States. Whatever, just get it together guys, SOON!!!

By: Thought

Thought — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:10:28 +0000

I agree with bluehorseshoe…the reason is simple: the iPhone release. ATT wanted to clear the decks for that alone.

All of this talk about technical glitches is just an excuse…it’s amazing how the technical glitches were solved everywhere else.

And even now, if you go into an ATT store, they still are selling more iPhones than anything else…