<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Didn&#8217;t RIM Officially Announce The BlackBerry Storm At CTIA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia/comment-page-1#comment-117110</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia#comment-117110</guid>
		<description>I think it was to tease the public...create some buzz...stretch this thing out.

Does anyone think those leaks from VZW, like that internal video for their retail sales team, were not intentional?

I think in some way it is succeeding; look at all the extra attention on the blogs, etc.   If RIM/VZW had just announced this thing, it would have been a one or two day story, and then faded until close to launch time.  Now the device generates a story a day it seems.

This is more reminiscent of when the Pearl was launched, where rumors and buzz did seem to work.

Let&#039;s face it; one more thing Apple has going for it are all the internet rumors and buzz.  This is an attempt to get in on that action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was to tease the public&#8230;create some buzz&#8230;stretch this thing out.</p>
<p>Does anyone think those leaks from VZW, like that internal video for their retail sales team, were not intentional?</p>
<p>I think in some way it is succeeding; look at all the extra attention on the blogs, etc.   If RIM/VZW had just announced this thing, it would have been a one or two day story, and then faded until close to launch time.  Now the device generates a story a day it seems.</p>
<p>This is more reminiscent of when the Pearl was launched, where rumors and buzz did seem to work.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it; one more thing Apple has going for it are all the internet rumors and buzz.  This is an attempt to get in on that action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia/comment-page-1#comment-117105</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia#comment-117105</guid>
		<description>Because RIM is stupid. This mess with the &quot;bloggers&quot; and Verizon wanting to create hype only confuses consumers. The fact there is not an official announcement is probably one of the stupidest things I&#039;ve ever seen from RIM. They are practically leaving everything up in the air so more people can go and buy iPhone 3Gs. It is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because RIM is stupid. This mess with the &#8220;bloggers&#8221; and Verizon wanting to create hype only confuses consumers. The fact there is not an official announcement is probably one of the stupidest things I&#8217;ve ever seen from RIM. They are practically leaving everything up in the air so more people can go and buy iPhone 3Gs. It is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris J.</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia/comment-page-1#comment-117104</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia#comment-117104</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because you&#039;re a moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because you&#8217;re a moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gquaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia/comment-page-1#comment-117098</link>
		<dc:creator>gquaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/why-didnt-rim-officially-announce-the-blackberry-storm-at-ctia#comment-117098</guid>
		<description>Because it&#039;s not coming out for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#8217;s not coming out for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

