<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are some BlackBerry faithful so resistant to innovation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/why-are-some-blackberry-faithful-so-resistant-to-innovation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-are-some-blackberry-faithful-so-resistant-to-innovation</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kay</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-are-some-blackberry-faithful-so-resistant-to-innovation/comment-page-1#comment-2943</link>
		<dc:creator>kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 23:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/242#comment-2943</guid>
		<description>how do i down load voice ringers to my 7100i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do i down load voice ringers to my 7100i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-are-some-blackberry-faithful-so-resistant-to-innovation/comment-page-1#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/242#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>Looks like RIM is finally coming around on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/560&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;adding a camera phone and MP3 to the BlackBerry&lt;/a&gt;.  Let&#039;s hope that think about removable memory as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like RIM is finally coming around on <a href="http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/560" rel="nofollow">adding a camera phone and MP3 to the BlackBerry</a>.  Let&#8217;s hope that think about removable memory as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-are-some-blackberry-faithful-so-resistant-to-innovation/comment-page-1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/242#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Corey,

I don&#039;t know of too many users out there that just go out and buy a BlackBerry and set it up on their BES without some direction for their Corporate IT departments.  All an IT staff has to do to stay off unsupported devices is create a policy stating which devices are or are not supported.  Most IT departments wouldn&#039;t allow a user to hop over to Best Buy or Comp USA, buy whatever laptop they want, then expect it to be connected to the production domain and supported like a company laptop.  Why should it be in differnt for BlackBerry Devices.

You are right, RIM has, as I mentioned as well, built a strong reputation of being very secure.  They definately don&#039;t want to come out with hardware configurations that are not secure, however, there are varying degrees of security.  What may be sercure to company A may not be secure at all to company B.  I know of several organizations that don&#039;t allow any BlackBerries with Bluetooth regardless of how secure the BlackBerry version of Bluetooth is.

All I am suggesting is that RIM investigate alternative hardware configurations.  If a company sees an external memory slot as a security threat, don&#039;t allow that type of BlackBerry on your network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of too many users out there that just go out and buy a BlackBerry and set it up on their BES without some direction for their Corporate IT departments.  All an IT staff has to do to stay off unsupported devices is create a policy stating which devices are or are not supported.  Most IT departments wouldn&#8217;t allow a user to hop over to Best Buy or Comp USA, buy whatever laptop they want, then expect it to be connected to the production domain and supported like a company laptop.  Why should it be in differnt for BlackBerry Devices.</p>
<p>You are right, RIM has, as I mentioned as well, built a strong reputation of being very secure.  They definately don&#8217;t want to come out with hardware configurations that are not secure, however, there are varying degrees of security.  What may be sercure to company A may not be secure at all to company B.  I know of several organizations that don&#8217;t allow any BlackBerries with Bluetooth regardless of how secure the BlackBerry version of Bluetooth is.</p>
<p>All I am suggesting is that RIM investigate alternative hardware configurations.  If a company sees an external memory slot as a security threat, don&#8217;t allow that type of BlackBerry on your network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-are-some-blackberry-faithful-so-resistant-to-innovation/comment-page-1#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/242#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you get a Treo if all the extra toys are important to you? RIM has built a reputation, and RIM takes care of it&#039;s customers. If you were in RIM&#039;s shoes and you had 70% of your customer base telling you to make it secure and you knew that bluetooth is very insecure, would you make apps for BT data transfer? No you wouldn&#039;t. The same goes for IR. You also wouldn&#039;t have a card slot where data can be saved from the handheld, then popped into any laptop and copied off. It&#039;s not smart to that stuff when your business is built on security and stability. It&#039;s also not smart to have these options on a &#039;consumer&#039; line of devices because a lot of people are told to &#039;get a blackberry&#039; and then the think that the $199 consumer model is the way to go, when all of a sudden they aren&#039;t allowed to have it on the corporate BES. Bad move to lean away from the total security of what RIM has built thusfar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you get a Treo if all the extra toys are important to you? RIM has built a reputation, and RIM takes care of it&#8217;s customers. If you were in RIM&#8217;s shoes and you had 70% of your customer base telling you to make it secure and you knew that bluetooth is very insecure, would you make apps for BT data transfer? No you wouldn&#8217;t. The same goes for IR. You also wouldn&#8217;t have a card slot where data can be saved from the handheld, then popped into any laptop and copied off. It&#8217;s not smart to that stuff when your business is built on security and stability. It&#8217;s also not smart to have these options on a &#8216;consumer&#8217; line of devices because a lot of people are told to &#8216;get a blackberry&#8217; and then the think that the $199 consumer model is the way to go, when all of a sudden they aren&#8217;t allowed to have it on the corporate BES. Bad move to lean away from the total security of what RIM has built thusfar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/why-are-some-blackberry-faithful-so-resistant-to-innovation/comment-page-1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/242#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I think that the blackberry&#039;s should add more features to them. I assist the users here at my company set them up and I belive if they had more features I would like to have one myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the blackberry&#8217;s should add more features to them. I assist the users here at my company set them up and I belive if they had more features I would like to have one myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

