<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the big deal about a BlackBerry with a Camera?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera/comment-page-1#comment-18509</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 03:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/850#comment-18509</guid>
		<description>Now I realize that there is a market for camera phones, mainly people who do not want to take quality pictures, it is mainly a plaything.  Rim, In my opinion has held off putting cameras in the blackberry for one main reason and one that i can attest to personally.  One of the largest users of blackberries are government officials around the world, FBI, CIA, CSIS, RCMP to name a few.  I work with government agencies very often, and in most cases upon entering security checks our phones.  Those with the treos and other &quot;camera phones&quot; have to leave them with security.  Imagine being in a six hour meeting with no access to your business because your phone is sitting in a lockbox.  I  know RIM is bandwagoning but you will never see cameras in their full line, and quite possibly the pearl may not even leave its shell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I realize that there is a market for camera phones, mainly people who do not want to take quality pictures, it is mainly a plaything.  Rim, In my opinion has held off putting cameras in the blackberry for one main reason and one that i can attest to personally.  One of the largest users of blackberries are government officials around the world, FBI, CIA, CSIS, RCMP to name a few.  I work with government agencies very often, and in most cases upon entering security checks our phones.  Those with the treos and other &#8220;camera phones&#8221; have to leave them with security.  Imagine being in a six hour meeting with no access to your business because your phone is sitting in a lockbox.  I  know RIM is bandwagoning but you will never see cameras in their full line, and quite possibly the pearl may not even leave its shell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera/comment-page-1#comment-18133</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/850#comment-18133</guid>
		<description>I am one of those that think placing a camera in a BlackBerry is a horrible idea. Is it because I am anti-technology? No, rather it is because the images that today&#039;s cell-phones take are horrible - they&#039;re poorly lit, fuzzy, tiny, out of focus, and add additional bulk and weight to the device. The 8700 is my second &#039;berry, my first being a 7520. The 8700 is certainly more sexy with its shiny, colorful screen, but I also noticed that the simpiler 7520 was much more stable, crashing perhaps only once in a couple of years of continuous use. The 8700 is still basically solid, but adding even more complexity does not excite me. 

Now if somebody finally provides a cell phone that takes images that appear to come from a Canon PowerShot instead of Fred Flinstone&#039;s camera then I&#039;ll be happy to change my tune.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of those that think placing a camera in a BlackBerry is a horrible idea. Is it because I am anti-technology? No, rather it is because the images that today&#8217;s cell-phones take are horrible &#8211; they&#8217;re poorly lit, fuzzy, tiny, out of focus, and add additional bulk and weight to the device. The 8700 is my second &#8216;berry, my first being a 7520. The 8700 is certainly more sexy with its shiny, colorful screen, but I also noticed that the simpiler 7520 was much more stable, crashing perhaps only once in a couple of years of continuous use. The 8700 is still basically solid, but adding even more complexity does not excite me. </p>
<p>Now if somebody finally provides a cell phone that takes images that appear to come from a Canon PowerShot instead of Fred Flinstone&#8217;s camera then I&#8217;ll be happy to change my tune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d_fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera/comment-page-1#comment-18095</link>
		<dc:creator>d_fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/850#comment-18095</guid>
		<description>Upcoming service packs are going to allow business that use BES to restrict the use of the camera and removable media among other things. I would guess that the service packs will come out at the same time as the 8100, or shortly there after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upcoming service packs are going to allow business that use BES to restrict the use of the camera and removable media among other things. I would guess that the service packs will come out at the same time as the 8100, or shortly there after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

