<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the big deal about a BlackBerry with a Camera?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera</link> <description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Grant</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera/comment-page-1#comment-18509</link> <dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 03:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/850#comment-18509</guid> <description>Now I realize that there is a market for camera phones, mainly people who do not want to take quality pictures, it is mainly a plaything.  Rim, In my opinion has held off putting cameras in the blackberry for one main reason and one that i can attest to personally.  One of the largest users of blackberries are government officials around the world, FBI, CIA, CSIS, RCMP to name a few.  I work with government agencies very often, and in most cases upon entering security checks our phones.  Those with the treos and other &quot;camera phones&quot; have to leave them with security.  Imagine being in a six hour meeting with no access to your business because your phone is sitting in a lockbox.  I  know RIM is bandwagoning but you will never see cameras in their full line, and quite possibly the pearl may not even leave its shell</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I realize that there is a market for camera phones, mainly people who do not want to take quality pictures, it is mainly a plaything.  Rim, In my opinion has held off putting cameras in the blackberry for one main reason and one that i can attest to personally.  One of the largest users of blackberries are government officials around the world, FBI, CIA, CSIS, RCMP to name a few.  I work with government agencies very often, and in most cases upon entering security checks our phones.  Those with the treos and other &#8220;camera phones&#8221; have to leave them with security.  Imagine being in a six hour meeting with no access to your business because your phone is sitting in a lockbox.  I  know RIM is bandwagoning but you will never see cameras in their full line, and quite possibly the pearl may not even leave its shell</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andy</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera/comment-page-1#comment-18133</link> <dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:43:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/850#comment-18133</guid> <description>I am one of those that think placing a camera in a BlackBerry is a horrible idea. Is it because I am anti-technology? No, rather it is because the images that today&#039;s cell-phones take are horrible - they&#039;re poorly lit, fuzzy, tiny, out of focus, and add additional bulk and weight to the device. The 8700 is my second &#039;berry, my first being a 7520. The 8700 is certainly more sexy with its shiny, colorful screen, but I also noticed that the simpiler 7520 was much more stable, crashing perhaps only once in a couple of years of continuous use. The 8700 is still basically solid, but adding even more complexity does not excite me.Now if somebody finally provides a cell phone that takes images that appear to come from a Canon PowerShot instead of Fred Flinstone&#039;s camera then I&#039;ll be happy to change my tune.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of those that think placing a camera in a BlackBerry is a horrible idea. Is it because I am anti-technology? No, rather it is because the images that today&#8217;s cell-phones take are horrible &#8211; they&#8217;re poorly lit, fuzzy, tiny, out of focus, and add additional bulk and weight to the device. The 8700 is my second &#8216;berry, my first being a 7520. The 8700 is certainly more sexy with its shiny, colorful screen, but I also noticed that the simpiler 7520 was much more stable, crashing perhaps only once in a couple of years of continuous use. The 8700 is still basically solid, but adding even more complexity does not excite me.</p><p>Now if somebody finally provides a cell phone that takes images that appear to come from a Canon PowerShot instead of Fred Flinstone&#8217;s camera then I&#8217;ll be happy to change my tune.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d_fisher</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/whats-the-big-deal-about-a-blackberry-with-a-camera/comment-page-1#comment-18095</link> <dc:creator>d_fisher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:12:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/850#comment-18095</guid> <description>Upcoming service packs are going to allow business that use BES to restrict the use of the camera and removable media among other things. I would guess that the service packs will come out at the same time as the 8100, or shortly there after.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upcoming service packs are going to allow business that use BES to restrict the use of the camera and removable media among other things. I would guess that the service packs will come out at the same time as the 8100, or shortly there after.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.rimarkable.com @ 2010-03-20 21:35:09 -->