<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you think about a GoogleBerry?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry</link>
	<description>The Official, Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry#comment-34995</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=1068#comment-34995</guid>
		<description>Stu: ESPN did do this as well, but it failed miserably (even though I thought the phones were kinda cool).

Google will have to come out with some fantastic software on the phone in order for this venture to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stu: ESPN did do this as well, but it failed miserably (even though I thought the phones were kinda cool).</p>
<p>Google will have to come out with some fantastic software on the phone in order for this venture to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry#comment-34986</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=1068#comment-34986</guid>
		<description>I've actually heard somewhere, sorry I cannot remember where, that a company was toying around with the idea of scanning incoming SMS messages and offering contextual ads based on their contents.  

As I think about it, Google is already doing this with Gmail and google talk.  I am sure that they have this in the back of their minds somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually heard somewhere, sorry I cannot remember where, that a company was toying around with the idea of scanning incoming SMS messages and offering contextual ads based on their contents.  </p>
<p>As I think about it, Google is already doing this with Gmail and google talk.  I am sure that they have this in the back of their minds somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry#comment-34974</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=1068#comment-34974</guid>
		<description>I think google would be smart enough to develop the phone so that it is not overly annoying with advertising.  I think that the ad angle would be less 'phone' based on more on using the smartphone capabilities, i.e. internet, calender, task, etc.  It's an ambitious project, but if ESPN can come out with a branded phone, I'm sure Google could as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think google would be smart enough to develop the phone so that it is not overly annoying with advertising.  I think that the ad angle would be less &#8216;phone&#8217; based on more on using the smartphone capabilities, i.e. internet, calender, task, etc.  It&#8217;s an ambitious project, but if ESPN can come out with a branded phone, I&#8217;m sure Google could as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry#comment-34966</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=1068#comment-34966</guid>
		<description>I am with TK and Thought on this one.  The idea almost reminds me of when People PC first hit the scene with a free computer if you ran their ad bar.  

Even though people signed up for it, it became so annoying that advertisors started to realize a negative preference of their products and services being advertised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with TK and Thought on this one.  The idea almost reminds me of when People PC first hit the scene with a free computer if you ran their ad bar.  </p>
<p>Even though people signed up for it, it became so annoying that advertisors started to realize a negative preference of their products and services being advertised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry#comment-34964</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=1068#comment-34964</guid>
		<description>The ad angle is interesting, but I personally would never settle for that.  No one is getting ads onto my phone...I'll gladly pay more to avoid that.

Also, carriers already offer subsidized pricing on phones, and many phones are offered for free...why would a consumer want to have to suffer through ads on a mobile device?

That being said, if Google comes out with something, then one can expect it be interesting and innovative. It would have to offer more than just the same Google software, like Google maps, that you can download yourself onto any phone.   Simply preloading the software doesn't add that much value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ad angle is interesting, but I personally would never settle for that.  No one is getting ads onto my phone&#8230;I&#8217;ll gladly pay more to avoid that.</p>
<p>Also, carriers already offer subsidized pricing on phones, and many phones are offered for free&#8230;why would a consumer want to have to suffer through ads on a mobile device?</p>
<p>That being said, if Google comes out with something, then one can expect it be interesting and innovative. It would have to offer more than just the same Google software, like Google maps, that you can download yourself onto any phone.   Simply preloading the software doesn&#8217;t add that much value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry#comment-34956</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=1068#comment-34956</guid>
		<description>I don't know that this would fly in the US.  I can't imagine having to watch a commercial everytime I wanted to make a call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that this would fly in the US.  I can&#8217;t imagine having to watch a commercial everytime I wanted to make a call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/what-do-you-think-about-a-googleberry#comment-34954</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=1068#comment-34954</guid>
		<description>Do you think that a phone from Google could be free and supported by advertising?  Maybe before you are able to make a call, you would have to watch a 10 or 15 second commercial or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that a phone from Google could be free and supported by advertising?  Maybe before you are able to make a call, you would have to watch a 10 or 15 second commercial or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
