<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Verizon Launching BlackBerry 8530 As BlackBerry Curve2</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-launching-blackberry-8530-as-blackberry-curve2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-launching-blackberry-8530-as-blackberry-curve2</link> <description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Amish</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-launching-blackberry-8530-as-blackberry-curve2/comment-page-1#comment-126074</link> <dc:creator>Amish</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:11:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=9255#comment-126074</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think there will be a CDMA BlackBerry 8900.  RIM is already working on the Tour2 so there really is no need for it</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there will be a CDMA BlackBerry 8900.  RIM is already working on the Tour2 so there really is no need for it</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-launching-blackberry-8530-as-blackberry-curve2/comment-page-1#comment-126050</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:30:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=9255#comment-126050</guid> <description>Hi Robb,I don&#039;t care if they call it the Curve75! haha. I just can&#039;t believe they are going with the 8520/8530 over the 8900. The 8900 is a much nicer Blackberry. The 8520 looks like it is for kids. It looks like a pay-as-you-go phone.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robb,</p><p>I don&#8217;t care if they call it the Curve75! haha. I just can&#8217;t believe they are going with the 8520/8530 over the 8900. The 8900 is a much nicer Blackberry. The 8520 looks like it is for kids. It looks like a pay-as-you-go phone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robb Dunewood</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-launching-blackberry-8530-as-blackberry-curve2/comment-page-1#comment-126044</link> <dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:50:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=9255#comment-126044</guid> <description>The reasoning behind my point that calling this the Curve2 is because of the popularity of the original Curve.  My guess is that the overwhelming majority of consumers that would actually buy this phone are those about to get their first smart phone and will see the Curve2 as the second edition Curve and get it based on brand recognition.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reasoning behind my point that calling this the Curve2 is because of the popularity of the original Curve.  My guess is that the overwhelming majority of consumers that would actually buy this phone are those about to get their first smart phone and will see the Curve2 as the second edition Curve and get it based on brand recognition.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-launching-blackberry-8530-as-blackberry-curve2/comment-page-1#comment-126025</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:28:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=9255#comment-126025</guid> <description>Yeah, the 8520 is like the phone that RIM is using for pay-as-you-go users or something. Pathetic. What were they thinking?I actually thought of saying &quot;crap phone&quot; in my earlier post Brixton. Thank you for doing so! haha</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the 8520 is like the phone that RIM is using for pay-as-you-go users or something. Pathetic. What were they thinking?</p><p>I actually thought of saying &#8220;crap phone&#8221; in my earlier post Brixton. Thank you for doing so! haha</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BrixtonMassive</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-launching-blackberry-8530-as-blackberry-curve2/comment-page-1#comment-126021</link> <dc:creator>BrixtonMassive</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:47:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=9255#comment-126021</guid> <description>Thats Right ERIC. The 8520 is a crap phone.  Why wouldnt they get the 8900. its not a smart move, especially calling it curve 2. I think the poster is wrong. I dont believe RIM would agree to that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats Right ERIC. The 8520 is a crap phone.  Why wouldnt they get the 8900. its not a smart move, especially calling it curve 2. I think the poster is wrong. I dont believe RIM would agree to that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-launching-blackberry-8530-as-blackberry-curve2/comment-page-1#comment-126002</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:48:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=9255#comment-126002</guid> <description>Is anyone else disappointed that Verizon is getting the CDMA version of the Curve 8520 instead of the Curve 8900? The 8520 looks cheap.I am not happy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone else disappointed that Verizon is getting the CDMA version of the Curve 8520 instead of the Curve 8900? The 8520 looks cheap.</p><p>I am not happy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.rimarkable.com @ 2010-03-21 12:15:08 -->