<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon Isn&#8217;t The Biggest, But, It Makes The Most Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnyheff</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money/comment-page-1#comment-116090</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnnyheff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money#comment-116090</guid>
		<description>...@ Greg

not really.  the larger differences b/t the two lie in network technology (GSM vs. CDMA -- which will change eventually, anyway) and availability of features.  vzw has a habit of locking down certain features that its gsm counterparts dont (e.g. - gps navigation) and requiring dataplans be purchased before you can even make a phone call with the phone (with gsm based phones, you can just buy the phone and use the PIM / phone features w/ out the use of data).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;@ Greg</p>
<p>not really.  the larger differences b/t the two lie in network technology (GSM vs. CDMA &#8212; which will change eventually, anyway) and availability of features.  vzw has a habit of locking down certain features that its gsm counterparts dont (e.g. &#8211; gps navigation) and requiring dataplans be purchased before you can even make a phone call with the phone (with gsm based phones, you can just buy the phone and use the PIM / phone features w/ out the use of data).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg B</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money/comment-page-1#comment-116083</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money#comment-116083</guid>
		<description>Is VZW that much more expensive than AT&amp;T?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is VZW that much more expensive than AT&amp;T?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money/comment-page-1#comment-116075</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money#comment-116075</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t the Verizon that is making the bet.  The Thunder will do well.  It is RIM...  

The BlackBerry Bold on Verizon would do ridiculously well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t the Verizon that is making the bet.  The Thunder will do well.  It is RIM&#8230;  </p>
<p>The BlackBerry Bold on Verizon would do ridiculously well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money/comment-page-1#comment-116072</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money#comment-116072</guid>
		<description>I think Verizon is making a serious humongous bet on the Thunder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Verizon is making a serious humongous bet on the Thunder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money/comment-page-1#comment-116071</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money#comment-116071</guid>
		<description>Verizon is a very well run company.  I do agree with argonnj that part of the reason why they make the most money is because they charge the most.

However, they are able to do that because they are viewed as having the most stable, reliable coverage.   If they ever are knocked off of that perch, then they will have hell to pay from customers or else will have to lower their fees.

Additionally, I would say that VZW is very astute in their marketing.  They have a very pervasive ad campaign that drives their message home.

I would  say, though, that once the Verizon/Alltel merger is approved, then VZW will once again become the largest wireless carrier in America.

Of course the high standing of VZW is just one more reason why it&#039;s just plain dumb for RIM to not drop the latest and greatest releases concurrently on GSM and CDMA.      But watch RIM release the Bold on ATT and then wait about a year to release it on VZW even though there will be huge sales to be had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon is a very well run company.  I do agree with argonnj that part of the reason why they make the most money is because they charge the most.</p>
<p>However, they are able to do that because they are viewed as having the most stable, reliable coverage.   If they ever are knocked off of that perch, then they will have hell to pay from customers or else will have to lower their fees.</p>
<p>Additionally, I would say that VZW is very astute in their marketing.  They have a very pervasive ad campaign that drives their message home.</p>
<p>I would  say, though, that once the Verizon/Alltel merger is approved, then VZW will once again become the largest wireless carrier in America.</p>
<p>Of course the high standing of VZW is just one more reason why it&#8217;s just plain dumb for RIM to not drop the latest and greatest releases concurrently on GSM and CDMA.      But watch RIM release the Bold on ATT and then wait about a year to release it on VZW even though there will be huge sales to be had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: argonnj</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money/comment-page-1#comment-116069</link>
		<dc:creator>argonnj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money#comment-116069</guid>
		<description>Verizon makes the most money because they charge the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon makes the most money because they charge the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnyheff</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money/comment-page-1#comment-116068</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnnyheff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/verizon-isnt-the-biggest-but-it-makes-the-most-money#comment-116068</guid>
		<description>...churn may drop, but i doubt by much.  the cost of breaking their agreements is likely to put a damper on switching.  not to mention, all vzw customers know that att coverage is horrible.  how could anyone go back to that?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;churn may drop, but i doubt by much.  the cost of breaking their agreements is likely to put a damper on switching.  not to mention, all vzw customers know that att coverage is horrible.  how could anyone go back to that?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

