<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The CameraBerry, urrr, umm, the BlackBerry 8100 series camerphone is unvieled&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/the-cameraberry-urrr-umm-the-blackberry-8100-series-camerphone-is-unvieled/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/the-cameraberry-urrr-umm-the-blackberry-8100-series-camerphone-is-unvieled</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry 8703e coming August 28th &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/the-cameraberry-urrr-umm-the-blackberry-8100-series-camerphone-is-unvieled/comment-page-1#comment-12785</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry 8703e coming August 28th &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=824#comment-12785</guid>
		<description>[...] ies devices.  Rumor has it that it won&#8217;t take the usual year for the recently leaked BlackBerry 8100 to come to Verizon.  Unless there is some significant functionality that I will be missing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ies devices.  Rumor has it that it won&#8217;t take the usual year for the recently leaked BlackBerry 8100 to come to Verizon.  Unless there is some significant functionality that I will be missing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 questions I have about the BlackBerry 8100 &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/the-cameraberry-urrr-umm-the-blackberry-8100-series-camerphone-is-unvieled/comment-page-1#comment-12725</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 questions I have about the BlackBerry 8100 &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=824#comment-12725</guid>
		<description>[...]    Top 10 questions I have about the BlackBerry 8100 	Surely, by now you have seen all the pictures of the BlackBerry 8100 cameraphone and heard of all the wonderful things that it is supposed to d [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    Top 10 questions I have about the BlackBerry 8100 	Surely, by now you have seen all the pictures of the BlackBerry 8100 cameraphone and heard of all the wonderful things that it is supposed to d [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/the-cameraberry-urrr-umm-the-blackberry-8100-series-camerphone-is-unvieled/comment-page-1#comment-12668</link>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=824#comment-12668</guid>
		<description>What carrier is it on?  The device has T-Mobile printed on it but has Cinglar diplayed on the screen?  So, which is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What carrier is it on?  The device has T-Mobile printed on it but has Cinglar diplayed on the screen?  So, which is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RydeWitM3</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/the-cameraberry-urrr-umm-the-blackberry-8100-series-camerphone-is-unvieled/comment-page-1#comment-12656</link>
		<dc:creator>RydeWitM3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 08:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=824#comment-12656</guid>
		<description>What is that icon with that looks like a girl (cartoon like character) with the headset on?
Also what does the arrow to the left of the end key do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is that icon with that looks like a girl (cartoon like character) with the headset on?<br />
Also what does the arrow to the left of the end key do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thought</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/the-cameraberry-urrr-umm-the-blackberry-8100-series-camerphone-is-unvieled/comment-page-1#comment-12611</link>
		<dc:creator>thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=824#comment-12611</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting to compare reality with the rumors first posted a few weeks ago from a source calling himself, I believe, &quot;Dawg.&quot;

The major thrust of what Dawg wrote was true: a BB with camera and music player, noticably thinner than other models.

However, the details were wrong: Dawg stated the device had a full QWERTY keyboard; this one does not and uses the suretype system.  Dawg compared the unit in size to an iPod nano; this one is much larger than that device, probably more akin to the SLVR in size.

Dawg also stated that the device had a camera superior to his Samsung digicam; of course we don&#039;t know at this point whether this is true or not, but on the other major points it appears that Dawg in his enthusiasm exaggerated things a bit.  I don&#039;t say this as criticism of Dawg, only in analysis.

What&#039;s the lesson to be learned?  That with regards to rumors, they are more likely to be true on the vague, larger points rather than in the details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to compare reality with the rumors first posted a few weeks ago from a source calling himself, I believe, &#8220;Dawg.&#8221;</p>
<p>The major thrust of what Dawg wrote was true: a BB with camera and music player, noticably thinner than other models.</p>
<p>However, the details were wrong: Dawg stated the device had a full QWERTY keyboard; this one does not and uses the suretype system.  Dawg compared the unit in size to an iPod nano; this one is much larger than that device, probably more akin to the SLVR in size.</p>
<p>Dawg also stated that the device had a camera superior to his Samsung digicam; of course we don&#8217;t know at this point whether this is true or not, but on the other major points it appears that Dawg in his enthusiasm exaggerated things a bit.  I don&#8217;t say this as criticism of Dawg, only in analysis.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the lesson to be learned?  That with regards to rumors, they are more likely to be true on the vague, larger points rather than in the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

