<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor:  4G BlackBerry With Front Facing Camera And 1Ghz Processor Coming In Q4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4/comment-page-1#comment-132056</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14653#comment-132056</guid>
		<description>A front facing camera is used for video conferencing using an app like Qik as used on the EVO, upcoming EPIC and Droid X to name a few. Having two cameras allows you to see and be seen while talking to someone or if doing a meeting via the phone. Go back to cnet and look at the phones I mentioned and I&#039;m sure they have much better explanations than I can give</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A front facing camera is used for video conferencing using an app like Qik as used on the EVO, upcoming EPIC and Droid X to name a few. Having two cameras allows you to see and be seen while talking to someone or if doing a meeting via the phone. Go back to cnet and look at the phones I mentioned and I&#8217;m sure they have much better explanations than I can give</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4/comment-page-1#comment-132027</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14653#comment-132027</guid>
		<description>It may be too late. They might have to hole up quietly for months and redesign the entire phone, keeping everything we love about the BlackBerry while adding everything that&#039;s expected of a smartphone (e.g., a front facing camera, for WHAT reason?  SRSLY, every new phone I see reviewed on CNET has &quot;no front facing camera&quot; on the cons list; who the F really needs that?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be too late. They might have to hole up quietly for months and redesign the entire phone, keeping everything we love about the BlackBerry while adding everything that&#8217;s expected of a smartphone (e.g., a front facing camera, for WHAT reason?  SRSLY, every new phone I see reviewed on CNET has &#8220;no front facing camera&#8221; on the cons list; who the F really needs that?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris crandon</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4/comment-page-1#comment-131703</link>
		<dc:creator>chris crandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14653#comment-131703</guid>
		<description>I would like it to have both touch and qwerty...like the slider...That would be the perfect storm..Just don&#039;t call it that..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like it to have both touch and qwerty&#8230;like the slider&#8230;That would be the perfect storm..Just don&#8217;t call it that..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gquaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4/comment-page-1#comment-131588</link>
		<dc:creator>gquaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14653#comment-131588</guid>
		<description>BB OS6 looks like it was designed to run on a touch screen.  It would be a fail of epic proportions if RIM made this so called &quot;iphone killer&quot; a QWERTY only without a touch screen.  But knowing RIM, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if they did it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BB OS6 looks like it was designed to run on a touch screen.  It would be a fail of epic proportions if RIM made this so called &#8220;iphone killer&#8221; a QWERTY only without a touch screen.  But knowing RIM, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they did it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benoit</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4/comment-page-1#comment-131578</link>
		<dc:creator>Benoit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14653#comment-131578</guid>
		<description>4G is for Wimax or LTE for Blackberry ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4G is for Wimax or LTE for Blackberry ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yavas Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4/comment-page-1#comment-131567</link>
		<dc:creator>Yavas Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14653#comment-131567</guid>
		<description>^ I do agree, but that is the direction BB needs to go in if they plan on staying in the smartphone race. But yea, if it&#039;s only on AT&amp;T or something like that, it won&#039;t do much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ I do agree, but that is the direction BB needs to go in if they plan on staying in the smartphone race. But yea, if it&#8217;s only on AT&amp;T or something like that, it won&#8217;t do much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ja2bk</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rumor-4g-blackberry-with-front-facing-camera-and-1ghz-processor-coming-in-q4/comment-page-1#comment-131557</link>
		<dc:creator>ja2bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14653#comment-131557</guid>
		<description>Now, these are the rumours we want to hear.  But, if it&#039;s an exclusive, then don&#039;t want to hear about it.  I think they need to do short windows perhaps, but they need devices on as much carriers as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, these are the rumours we want to hear.  But, if it&#8217;s an exclusive, then don&#8217;t want to hear about it.  I think they need to do short windows perhaps, but they need devices on as much carriers as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

