<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIM Co-CEO Jim Balsillie Says Buggy Smartphone Software Is The &#8220;New Reality&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cell Phone Junkie Show #140 &#171; Mickey Papillon</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119708</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cell Phone Junkie Show #140 &#171; Mickey Papillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119708</guid>
		<description>[...] Is buggy software the new reality of smartphones? Sprint eliminating 8000 jobs New law requiring &#8220;click&#8221; for cameras Rogue android app [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is buggy software the new reality of smartphones? Sprint eliminating 8000 jobs New law requiring &#8220;click&#8221; for cameras Rogue android app [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smackdye</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119686</link>
		<dc:creator>Smackdye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119686</guid>
		<description>Ok first stop boo hooing about what he said. He was correct tho that is the future of all cell phone company&#039;s they have to beat the others out the gate with new product... No phone is glitch free it was mostly verizons fault for releasing the storm 4 days before it was posed to be revised less than a week later RIM announced the updated software for the storm
Second ... The i phone is nothing more than the next &quot;cool&quot; thing I know peoplebthat have them and they kinda defete the purpose of a compact powerhouse cell phone My buddy dropped his I phone 2 feet to the floor on carpet and it completely shot s he had to grab his blackberry out of his glove box and use that ( as the i phone does not come with insurance he is out of the 400 bucks too bad for him
Bottom line... Bla9kberry I&#039;d hands down the best phone I have ever used I love it and will probably never change! Oh and the storm is just a crap phone to start with</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok first stop boo hooing about what he said. He was correct tho that is the future of all cell phone company&#8217;s they have to beat the others out the gate with new product&#8230; No phone is glitch free it was mostly verizons fault for releasing the storm 4 days before it was posed to be revised less than a week later RIM announced the updated software for the storm<br />
Second &#8230; The i phone is nothing more than the next &#8220;cool&#8221; thing I know peoplebthat have them and they kinda defete the purpose of a compact powerhouse cell phone My buddy dropped his I phone 2 feet to the floor on carpet and it completely shot s he had to grab his blackberry out of his glove box and use that ( as the i phone does not come with insurance he is out of the 400 bucks too bad for him<br />
Bottom line&#8230; Bla9kberry I&#8217;d hands down the best phone I have ever used I love it and will probably never change! Oh and the storm is just a crap phone to start with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cranky Consumer</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119664</link>
		<dc:creator>Cranky Consumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119664</guid>
		<description>As a long time software developer and manager in the telecommunications industry, I can categorically state that if that attitude is pervasive in the company, especially coming from the top, then RIM deserves to get their &quot;new reality&quot; kicked hard in the butt by the marketplace.

This is not supposed to be the crappy desktop quality software we&#039;re used to from Microsoft and less so from Apple, it&#039;s supposed to be carrier-grade quality; 99.9994% uptime. OK, maybe we can relax that a bit for handhelds, but given their server outages, RIM should be targeting 5-nines reliability instead of 9-fives (55.5555555%).

To all the developers and testers at RIM, let me say that Mr. Sillyballs has blessed your crappy software. Yes, you&#039;ll still get an excellent performance review when the software you wrote crashes thousands of handsets on a daily basis. Yes, it&#039;s OK to have more than one beer at lunch now; the new standard is one six-pack.

I mean, can you see Steve Jobs saying something like this to Apple engineers? I think he&#039;d stomp the guts out of anyone who even suggested that poor quality was the new reality. No, Apple does not make perfect products, but that&#039;s their goal.

Uh, is it politically incorrect to use an iPhone at work in RIM? Is it like driving a Honda when going to work at the Ford plant? Will other workers key your iPhone screen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long time software developer and manager in the telecommunications industry, I can categorically state that if that attitude is pervasive in the company, especially coming from the top, then RIM deserves to get their &#8220;new reality&#8221; kicked hard in the butt by the marketplace.</p>
<p>This is not supposed to be the crappy desktop quality software we&#8217;re used to from Microsoft and less so from Apple, it&#8217;s supposed to be carrier-grade quality; 99.9994% uptime. OK, maybe we can relax that a bit for handhelds, but given their server outages, RIM should be targeting 5-nines reliability instead of 9-fives (55.5555555%).</p>
<p>To all the developers and testers at RIM, let me say that Mr. Sillyballs has blessed your crappy software. Yes, you&#8217;ll still get an excellent performance review when the software you wrote crashes thousands of handsets on a daily basis. Yes, it&#8217;s OK to have more than one beer at lunch now; the new standard is one six-pack.</p>
<p>I mean, can you see Steve Jobs saying something like this to Apple engineers? I think he&#8217;d stomp the guts out of anyone who even suggested that poor quality was the new reality. No, Apple does not make perfect products, but that&#8217;s their goal.</p>
<p>Uh, is it politically incorrect to use an iPhone at work in RIM? Is it like driving a Honda when going to work at the Ford plant? Will other workers key your iPhone screen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Storm Doing Better Than We Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119627</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Storm Doing Better Than We Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119627</guid>
		<description>[...] in Motion and the BlackBerry Storm took a bit of a beating yesterday after a pretty stupid comment by RIM co-CEO Jim Balsille in an WSJ article hit the internet.  One of the things mentioned in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Motion and the BlackBerry Storm took a bit of a beating yesterday after a pretty stupid comment by RIM co-CEO Jim Balsille in an WSJ article hit the internet.  One of the things mentioned in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119625</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119625</guid>
		<description>Hate to keep beating this idea into the ground but RIM with some well placed brick and mortar stores, non-exclusive phones and some well thought out large scale beta testing could be alleviating alot of the bugs before the phones are released for sale to consumers.  I also agree that the current BB OS is end of life and a change should be made if RIM wants to try and keep up with the market leaders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to keep beating this idea into the ground but RIM with some well placed brick and mortar stores, non-exclusive phones and some well thought out large scale beta testing could be alleviating alot of the bugs before the phones are released for sale to consumers.  I also agree that the current BB OS is end of life and a change should be made if RIM wants to try and keep up with the market leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gquaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119624</link>
		<dc:creator>gquaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119624</guid>
		<description>RIM simply isn&#039;t up to the task of putting out a state of the art smart phone.  The are trying to mold their aging OS into the likes of the iphone or Android, which it simply isn&#039;t capable of.  I also don&#039;t really think RIM&#039;s engineers are up to the task.  They seem to be stuck in 1st gear, while everyone else is in overdrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIM simply isn&#8217;t up to the task of putting out a state of the art smart phone.  The are trying to mold their aging OS into the likes of the iphone or Android, which it simply isn&#8217;t capable of.  I also don&#8217;t really think RIM&#8217;s engineers are up to the task.  They seem to be stuck in 1st gear, while everyone else is in overdrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119615</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119615</guid>
		<description>And so it begins, just a taste...

Open mouth, insert BlackBerry
http://www.betanews.com/article/Open_mouth_insert_BlackBerry/1233013478</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And so it begins, just a taste&#8230;</p>
<p>Open mouth, insert BlackBerry<br />
<a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Open_mouth_insert_BlackBerry/1233013478" rel="nofollow">http://www.betanews.com/article/Open_mouth_insert_BlackBerry/1233013478</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119608</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119608</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree with you guys.  Don&#039;t think RIM needs to or should limit their market to &quot;lifestyle&quot; or &quot;work&quot;.   Apple is not doing that with the iPhone.  Not a fan of limits, don&#039;t think limits are a good thing.  I DO agree &quot;Do something, if only one single thing, and do it well. Consumers appreciate that.&quot;  But think RIM, like Apple has the ability to do more than one thing right.

For example lets go back a few years.   RIM was late to adding camera&#039;s onto their BB, the excuse from enthusiasts was &quot;it&#039;s a business device&quot; / &quot;corporate security&quot; bla bla bla.  That&#039;s a reason for RIM to make a non-camera device but it&#039;s not at all a reason for RIM to make all BB&#039;s non-camera devices.  Everyone must remember there is at least a few hours in the day when business is done and non-business time begins.  There is no reason why RIM or Apple can&#039;t do both well.  

Speaking of why labels and limits are a bad thing, we still have enthusiasts trying to claim Apple&#039;s iPhone is not  &quot;business&quot; because their universal desktop sync program works through the iTunes app.  Perhaps the same can be said about RIM and it&#039;s continued lack of native support for any desktop sync program other than windoz OS?  There are plenty of &quot;business&#039;s&quot; which don&#039;t do windoz, yet in order to use BB&#039;s rely on 3rd party sync programs which have never been up to snuff with the native BB desktop.  Why is RIM unable to provide a native sync for the BB&#039;s?  Why should &quot;lifestyle&quot; and &quot;work&quot; BB users who don&#039;t do windoz&#039;s continue to be unsupported?

Label&#039;s and limits are a bad thing.  Who knows, if RIM had ever given universal native support to multiple OS&#039;s, if RIM started to support &quot;lifestyle&quot; and &quot;work&quot; sooner, before being pushed by Apple and the iPhone to do so perhaps RIM&#039;s CEO&#039;s wouldn&#039;t be making excuses to the press for the current and future flagship BB&#039;s being released to consumers with software and hardware bugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with you guys.  Don&#8217;t think RIM needs to or should limit their market to &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; or &#8220;work&#8221;.   Apple is not doing that with the iPhone.  Not a fan of limits, don&#8217;t think limits are a good thing.  I DO agree &#8220;Do something, if only one single thing, and do it well. Consumers appreciate that.&#8221;  But think RIM, like Apple has the ability to do more than one thing right.</p>
<p>For example lets go back a few years.   RIM was late to adding camera&#8217;s onto their BB, the excuse from enthusiasts was &#8220;it&#8217;s a business device&#8221; / &#8220;corporate security&#8221; bla bla bla.  That&#8217;s a reason for RIM to make a non-camera device but it&#8217;s not at all a reason for RIM to make all BB&#8217;s non-camera devices.  Everyone must remember there is at least a few hours in the day when business is done and non-business time begins.  There is no reason why RIM or Apple can&#8217;t do both well.  </p>
<p>Speaking of why labels and limits are a bad thing, we still have enthusiasts trying to claim Apple&#8217;s iPhone is not  &#8220;business&#8221; because their universal desktop sync program works through the iTunes app.  Perhaps the same can be said about RIM and it&#8217;s continued lack of native support for any desktop sync program other than windoz OS?  There are plenty of &#8220;business&#8217;s&#8221; which don&#8217;t do windoz, yet in order to use BB&#8217;s rely on 3rd party sync programs which have never been up to snuff with the native BB desktop.  Why is RIM unable to provide a native sync for the BB&#8217;s?  Why should &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; and &#8220;work&#8221; BB users who don&#8217;t do windoz&#8217;s continue to be unsupported?</p>
<p>Label&#8217;s and limits are a bad thing.  Who knows, if RIM had ever given universal native support to multiple OS&#8217;s, if RIM started to support &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; and &#8220;work&#8221; sooner, before being pushed by Apple and the iPhone to do so perhaps RIM&#8217;s CEO&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t be making excuses to the press for the current and future flagship BB&#8217;s being released to consumers with software and hardware bugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/rim-co-ceo-jim-balsillie-says-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/comment-page-1#comment-119607</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3337#comment-119607</guid>
		<description>I agree with VEA -- the iphone should stand for &quot;lifestyle&quot; and the blackberry should stand for &quot;work.&quot; Stick to your respective categories for strength rather than trying to eat every piece of the pie even if it doesn&#039;t fit in your mouth. Do something, if only one single thing, and do it well. Consumers appreciate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with VEA &#8212; the iphone should stand for &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; and the blackberry should stand for &#8220;work.&#8221; Stick to your respective categories for strength rather than trying to eat every piece of the pie even if it doesn&#8217;t fit in your mouth. Do something, if only one single thing, and do it well. Consumers appreciate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

