<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Research In Motion Working On An Apple Killer</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer</link> <description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Doug</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-113501</link> <dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-113501</guid> <description>This seems like a weird choice to choice for BB to me.  The iPhone is a very nice play toy, but just does not have it when it comes to business use.  I would love a touch screen device, but it has to have a keyboard that really works.  The iPhone keyboard is terrible.  I look at it this way.  If RIM can make a usable product (meaning significanly better than an iPhone toy clone) than go for it.  However, if you only make a product that is just as good as far as touch screen ability and is better as far as enterprise/business use then don&#039;t bother.  The most unworkable part of the iPhone is the weakness of the touch technology.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a weird choice to choice for BB to me.  The iPhone is a very nice play toy, but just does not have it when it comes to business use.  I would love a touch screen device, but it has to have a keyboard that really works.  The iPhone keyboard is terrible.  I look at it this way.  If RIM can make a usable product (meaning significanly better than an iPhone toy clone) than go for it.  However, if you only make a product that is just as good as far as touch screen ability and is better as far as enterprise/business use then don&#8217;t bother.  The most unworkable part of the iPhone is the weakness of the touch technology.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Why Is RIM Looking For An iPhone Developer? &#124; RIMarkable</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-112715</link> <dc:creator>Why Is RIM Looking For An iPhone Developer? &#124; RIMarkable</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-112715</guid> <description>[...] guess there are a couple of ways you could go with this. RIM is definitely working on a touch screen BlackBerry. Maybe they are looking for someone with expertise on the iPhone&#8217;s interface. The issue I see [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guess there are a couple of ways you could go with this. RIM is definitely working on a touch screen BlackBerry. Maybe they are looking for someone with expertise on the iPhone&#8217;s interface. The issue I see [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bluehorseshoe</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-112623</link> <dc:creator>bluehorseshoe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-112623</guid> <description>I have to say that all the talk about how the BB needs to compete, catch up, etc. with the iPhone is getting a bit long.  They both carry a certain dominance in two different markets (at least when it comes down to publicity and media...ha).The fact that the BB has carved out a niche in the corporate market with it&#039;s email platform, keyboard, security, etc. has made &#039;it&#039; the envy of the corporate market and a benchmark for those aspiring to shoot for.  I would think that the iPhone is trying to gain on BB territory for the corporate market...attempting to be the &#039;BB killer&#039;.  Not happening anytime soon.  They haven&#039;t been able to penetrate a large percentage of the corporate marketplace with their desktops and laptops (which they&#039;ve been trying for decades), and I don&#039;t believe they will be able to capture much of the corporate space with the iPhone either.On the other hand, with BB coming up with the potential for a touch screen, I can&#039;t believe that they realistically believe that their device will be an &#039;iPhone killer&#039;.  May take some market share away, but it&#039;s neither an area of expertise for them, nor their business model.Just my humble opinion... :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that all the talk about how the BB needs to compete, catch up, etc. with the iPhone is getting a bit long.  They both carry a certain dominance in two different markets (at least when it comes down to publicity and media&#8230;ha).</p><p>The fact that the BB has carved out a niche in the corporate market with it&#8217;s email platform, keyboard, security, etc. has made &#8216;it&#8217; the envy of the corporate market and a benchmark for those aspiring to shoot for.  I would think that the iPhone is trying to gain on BB territory for the corporate market&#8230;attempting to be the &#8216;BB killer&#8217;.  Not happening anytime soon.  They haven&#8217;t been able to penetrate a large percentage of the corporate marketplace with their desktops and laptops (which they&#8217;ve been trying for decades), and I don&#8217;t believe they will be able to capture much of the corporate space with the iPhone either.</p><p>On the other hand, with BB coming up with the potential for a touch screen, I can&#8217;t believe that they realistically believe that their device will be an &#8216;iPhone killer&#8217;.  May take some market share away, but it&#8217;s neither an area of expertise for them, nor their business model.</p><p>Just my humble opinion&#8230; <img
src='http://www.rimarkable.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: REV</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-112621</link> <dc:creator>REV</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-112621</guid> <description>I wonder if the &quot;Apple Killer&quot; designation (if such a name is really being used at RIM) is just something internal, to jazz employees up and boost the amount of energy they devote to the project.Haven&#039;t we all been on the receiving end of an internal rollout where we felt that management was trying really hard to convince employees that this was the &quot;next great thing&quot;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the &#8220;Apple Killer&#8221; designation (if such a name is really being used at RIM) is just something internal, to jazz employees up and boost the amount of energy they devote to the project.</p><p>Haven&#8217;t we all been on the receiving end of an internal rollout where we felt that management was trying really hard to convince employees that this was the &#8220;next great thing&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JohnnyHeff</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-112619</link> <dc:creator>JohnnyHeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-112619</guid> <description>...im have to admit im tired of hearing about iphone killers.  the iphone targets a specific kind of market segment.  but until its price becomes more reasonable, its business solutions more robust and it finishes out its ill conceived 5-yr. agreement with att, i could care less what the iphone does (or doesnt do).having said that, i think vzw has come out with a comparable device in the new xv6900.  albeit, the iphone has the edge on the touch technology, i think the xv6900 is more in line with this technology than the lg voyager.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;im have to admit im tired of hearing about iphone killers.  the iphone targets a specific kind of market segment.  but until its price becomes more reasonable, its business solutions more robust and it finishes out its ill conceived 5-yr. agreement with att, i could care less what the iphone does (or doesnt do).</p><p>having said that, i think vzw has come out with a comparable device in the new xv6900.  albeit, the iphone has the edge on the touch technology, i think the xv6900 is more in line with this technology than the lg voyager.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.rimarkable.com @ 2010-03-21 15:36:51 -->