<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research In Motion Working On An Apple Killer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-113501</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-113501</guid>
		<description>This seems like a weird choice to choice for BB to me.  The iPhone is a very nice play toy, but just does not have it when it comes to business use.  I would love a touch screen device, but it has to have a keyboard that really works.  The iPhone keyboard is terrible.  I look at it this way.  If RIM can make a usable product (meaning significanly better than an iPhone toy clone) than go for it.  However, if you only make a product that is just as good as far as touch screen ability and is better as far as enterprise/business use then don&#039;t bother.  The most unworkable part of the iPhone is the weakness of the touch technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a weird choice to choice for BB to me.  The iPhone is a very nice play toy, but just does not have it when it comes to business use.  I would love a touch screen device, but it has to have a keyboard that really works.  The iPhone keyboard is terrible.  I look at it this way.  If RIM can make a usable product (meaning significanly better than an iPhone toy clone) than go for it.  However, if you only make a product that is just as good as far as touch screen ability and is better as far as enterprise/business use then don&#8217;t bother.  The most unworkable part of the iPhone is the weakness of the touch technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Is RIM Looking For An iPhone Developer? &#124; RIMarkable</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-112715</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Is RIM Looking For An iPhone Developer? &#124; RIMarkable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-112715</guid>
		<description>[...] guess there are a couple of ways you could go with this. RIM is definitely working on a touch screen BlackBerry. Maybe they are looking for someone with expertise on the iPhone&#8217;s interface. The issue I see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guess there are a couple of ways you could go with this. RIM is definitely working on a touch screen BlackBerry. Maybe they are looking for someone with expertise on the iPhone&#8217;s interface. The issue I see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluehorseshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-112623</link>
		<dc:creator>bluehorseshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-112623</guid>
		<description>I have to say that all the talk about how the BB needs to compete, catch up, etc. with the iPhone is getting a bit long.  They both carry a certain dominance in two different markets (at least when it comes down to publicity and media...ha).

The fact that the BB has carved out a niche in the corporate market with it&#039;s email platform, keyboard, security, etc. has made &#039;it&#039; the envy of the corporate market and a benchmark for those aspiring to shoot for.  I would think that the iPhone is trying to gain on BB territory for the corporate market...attempting to be the &#039;BB killer&#039;.  Not happening anytime soon.  They haven&#039;t been able to penetrate a large percentage of the corporate marketplace with their desktops and laptops (which they&#039;ve been trying for decades), and I don&#039;t believe they will be able to capture much of the corporate space with the iPhone either.

On the other hand, with BB coming up with the potential for a touch screen, I can&#039;t believe that they realistically believe that their device will be an &#039;iPhone killer&#039;.  May take some market share away, but it&#039;s neither an area of expertise for them, nor their business model.

Just my humble opinion... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that all the talk about how the BB needs to compete, catch up, etc. with the iPhone is getting a bit long.  They both carry a certain dominance in two different markets (at least when it comes down to publicity and media&#8230;ha).</p>
<p>The fact that the BB has carved out a niche in the corporate market with it&#8217;s email platform, keyboard, security, etc. has made &#8216;it&#8217; the envy of the corporate market and a benchmark for those aspiring to shoot for.  I would think that the iPhone is trying to gain on BB territory for the corporate market&#8230;attempting to be the &#8216;BB killer&#8217;.  Not happening anytime soon.  They haven&#8217;t been able to penetrate a large percentage of the corporate marketplace with their desktops and laptops (which they&#8217;ve been trying for decades), and I don&#8217;t believe they will be able to capture much of the corporate space with the iPhone either.</p>
<p>On the other hand, with BB coming up with the potential for a touch screen, I can&#8217;t believe that they realistically believe that their device will be an &#8216;iPhone killer&#8217;.  May take some market share away, but it&#8217;s neither an area of expertise for them, nor their business model.</p>
<p>Just my humble opinion&#8230; <img src='http://www.rimarkable.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REV</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-112621</link>
		<dc:creator>REV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-112621</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the &quot;Apple Killer&quot; designation (if such a name is really being used at RIM) is just something internal, to jazz employees up and boost the amount of energy they devote to the project.

Haven&#039;t we all been on the receiving end of an internal rollout where we felt that management was trying really hard to convince employees that this was the &quot;next great thing&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the &#8220;Apple Killer&#8221; designation (if such a name is really being used at RIM) is just something internal, to jazz employees up and boost the amount of energy they devote to the project.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t we all been on the receiving end of an internal rollout where we felt that management was trying really hard to convince employees that this was the &#8220;next great thing&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyHeff</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer/comment-page-1#comment-112619</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyHeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/research-in-motion-working-on-an-apple-killer#comment-112619</guid>
		<description>...im have to admit im tired of hearing about iphone killers.  the iphone targets a specific kind of market segment.  but until its price becomes more reasonable, its business solutions more robust and it finishes out its ill conceived 5-yr. agreement with att, i could care less what the iphone does (or doesnt do).

having said that, i think vzw has come out with a comparable device in the new xv6900.  albeit, the iphone has the edge on the touch technology, i think the xv6900 is more in line with this technology than the lg voyager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;im have to admit im tired of hearing about iphone killers.  the iphone targets a specific kind of market segment.  but until its price becomes more reasonable, its business solutions more robust and it finishes out its ill conceived 5-yr. agreement with att, i could care less what the iphone does (or doesnt do).</p>
<p>having said that, i think vzw has come out with a comparable device in the new xv6900.  albeit, the iphone has the edge on the touch technology, i think the xv6900 is more in line with this technology than the lg voyager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

