<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OS Update for T-Mobile BlackBerry Bold 9700 &#8211; .713!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/os-update-for-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9700-713/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/os-update-for-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9700-713</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ehrlich</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/os-update-for-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9700-713/comment-page-1#comment-130995</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ehrlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14012#comment-130995</guid>
		<description>FYI, for those who updated..

So far the changes are as follows:
- People are noticing the browser speed has marginally improved. 
- Blackberry Messenger is now part of the &#039;Core&#039; apps and cannot be deleted natively
- Some people are noticing a slight increase in available free memory (average is about 2-4 mb) and responsiveness of the phone.
- 3G to WiFi change-over is quicker 

For those who are hesitant about doing an OTA update, the download for the Desktop Manager is now available. Visit, http://www.t-mobile.com/bbupgrade/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, for those who updated..</p>
<p>So far the changes are as follows:<br />
- People are noticing the browser speed has marginally improved.<br />
- Blackberry Messenger is now part of the &#8216;Core&#8217; apps and cannot be deleted natively<br />
- Some people are noticing a slight increase in available free memory (average is about 2-4 mb) and responsiveness of the phone.<br />
- 3G to WiFi change-over is quicker </p>
<p>For those who are hesitant about doing an OTA update, the download for the Desktop Manager is now available. Visit, <a href="http://www.t-mobile.com/bbupgrade/" rel="nofollow">http://www.t-mobile.com/bbupgrade/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluehorseshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/os-update-for-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9700-713/comment-page-1#comment-130993</link>
		<dc:creator>bluehorseshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14012#comment-130993</guid>
		<description>I was actually being sarcastic with regard to the patch helping TMO&#039;s coverage (but their coverage is bad). I&#039;m actually in the business and test many of these devices, providing error logs to RIM for newly released products.  I had a laundry list for the TMO 9700 when it came to errors.  I run 6 devices across the big 4 carriers, testing coverage, devices, etc. Personally, I loved the build, feel, battery, etc. of the 9700, but TMO just failed on coverage and the device had multiple SW build issues.  Couldn&#039;t use it as a primary which I was hoping for.  AT&amp;T is not much better when it comes to reliability and dropped calls...and I reside where their former headquarters was just 2 years ago.  Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually being sarcastic with regard to the patch helping TMO&#8217;s coverage (but their coverage is bad). I&#8217;m actually in the business and test many of these devices, providing error logs to RIM for newly released products.  I had a laundry list for the TMO 9700 when it came to errors.  I run 6 devices across the big 4 carriers, testing coverage, devices, etc. Personally, I loved the build, feel, battery, etc. of the 9700, but TMO just failed on coverage and the device had multiple SW build issues.  Couldn&#8217;t use it as a primary which I was hoping for.  AT&amp;T is not much better when it comes to reliability and dropped calls&#8230;and I reside where their former headquarters was just 2 years ago.  Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/os-update-for-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9700-713/comment-page-1#comment-130992</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14012#comment-130992</guid>
		<description>great find! thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great find! thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ehrlich</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/os-update-for-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9700-713/comment-page-1#comment-130991</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ehrlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14012#comment-130991</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty confident that this update had nothing to do with T-Mobile&#039;s coverage. That&#039;s dependent upon their network infrastructure and cellular towers. These updates are geared more towards tweaking and optimizing the phone&#039;s software, i.e. memory leaks, known glitches, etc. 
The most important thing when deciding on a phone is to make sure that the carrier&#039;s coverage is sufficient in your area. If you have a lackluster mobile coverage you can pretty much label your Blackberry as an expensive paper weight. If you really love this hardware, consider looking at AT&amp;T. They have the same exact phone and their coverage might be a little more complete in your location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty confident that this update had nothing to do with T-Mobile&#8217;s coverage. That&#8217;s dependent upon their network infrastructure and cellular towers. These updates are geared more towards tweaking and optimizing the phone&#8217;s software, i.e. memory leaks, known glitches, etc.<br />
The most important thing when deciding on a phone is to make sure that the carrier&#8217;s coverage is sufficient in your area. If you have a lackluster mobile coverage you can pretty much label your Blackberry as an expensive paper weight. If you really love this hardware, consider looking at AT&amp;T. They have the same exact phone and their coverage might be a little more complete in your location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluehorseshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/os-update-for-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9700-713/comment-page-1#comment-130990</link>
		<dc:creator>bluehorseshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14012#comment-130990</guid>
		<description>Did the patch help TMO&#039;s coverage map?  Damn I wanted to like that phone on that service.  No matter how many patches they send out, it won&#039;t fix the overall service and reception.  After the countless times I ran down the issues with them, plus receiving a free HD2 from them, there was no way anyone can rely on their service and feel comfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the patch help TMO&#8217;s coverage map?  Damn I wanted to like that phone on that service.  No matter how many patches they send out, it won&#8217;t fix the overall service and reception.  After the countless times I ran down the issues with them, plus receiving a free HD2 from them, there was no way anyone can rely on their service and feel comfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

