<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not a single BlackBerry in the top 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/not-a-single-blackberry-in-the-top-5/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/not-a-single-blackberry-in-the-top-5</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thought</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/not-a-single-blackberry-in-the-top-5/comment-page-1#comment-12080</link>
		<dc:creator>thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=807#comment-12080</guid>
		<description>I agree: the Sidekick is more of a toy for teenagers who love instant messaging.  There&#039;s nothing wrong with that...they sell very well, but the Sidekick does not deserve to be so high on the list, and only one point behind the Palm 700p, which is a far more capable device.

As for no BB on the list: I guess the folks at PC World write for the general consumer market, which would explain their emphasis on features like camera, mp3, etc.   Apparently, they don&#039;t put much merit in actually using the device as a business tool, rather than as a toy.  

Personally, I think that the BB 8700 should have made the list.   It not only uses the great BB system, but it has an incredible screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree: the Sidekick is more of a toy for teenagers who love instant messaging.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with that&#8230;they sell very well, but the Sidekick does not deserve to be so high on the list, and only one point behind the Palm 700p, which is a far more capable device.</p>
<p>As for no BB on the list: I guess the folks at PC World write for the general consumer market, which would explain their emphasis on features like camera, mp3, etc.   Apparently, they don&#8217;t put much merit in actually using the device as a business tool, rather than as a toy.  </p>
<p>Personally, I think that the BB 8700 should have made the list.   It not only uses the great BB system, but it has an incredible screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nofx</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/not-a-single-blackberry-in-the-top-5/comment-page-1#comment-12071</link>
		<dc:creator>nofx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=807#comment-12071</guid>
		<description>most of this smartphones got pretty much everything, camera, multimedia, and email. blackberry only got email as the strongest point. i dont blame them for not putting bb&#039;s on their top 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of this smartphones got pretty much everything, camera, multimedia, and email. blackberry only got email as the strongest point. i dont blame them for not putting bb&#8217;s on their top 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/not-a-single-blackberry-in-the-top-5/comment-page-1#comment-12070</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=807#comment-12070</guid>
		<description>well, the sidekick does have that sweed magnet which wipes your credit card mangetic strip if they come in contact together. it&#039;s pretty hard to top that feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, the sidekick does have that sweed magnet which wipes your credit card mangetic strip if they come in contact together. it&#8217;s pretty hard to top that feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

