Comments on: Motley Fool Says Research In Motion (RIMM) Worst Stock For 2008…

By: alinnible

alinnible — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:18:10 +0000

I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:

By: Doodee

Doodee — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:48:55 +0000

Thanks for sharing

By: Research In Motion Stock (RIMM) Down Big Yesterday | RIMarkable | The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:56:06 +0000

[...] last week when the Motley Fool said that Research in Motion would be the worst stock in 2008? I am pretty sure that I still disagree with that, however, it sure felt like it was true [...]

By: Iphone » Blog Archive » Comment on Motley Fool Says Research In Motion (RIMM) Worst Stock…

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:04:28 +0000

[...] Puromac: Apple Mac en espaÃ±ol wrote an interesting post today on Comment on Motley Fool Says Research In Motion (RIMM) Worst Stock…Here’s a quick excerptI don’t believe its the worst, but it may come down a little. I think they benefited from the iPhone release. [...]

By: jonabyte

jonabyte — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:56:02 +0000

I don’t believe its the worst, but it may come down a little. I think they benefited from the iPhone release.

By: bluehorseshoe

bluehorseshoe — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:28:29 +0000

Spelling bees aside…

I’d have a hard time believing that RIMM will finish as one of the worst stock picks for 2008 (with so many others that can easy take that spot). If we factor in all of the companies in the tech sector, I would have to say RIMM is one of those that will float above simply because of it’s earnings trend vs. other potential tech investments. Perhaps there isn’t a new ‘Curve’ or ‘Pearl’ hitting the market today, but I’m sure the demand to replace those old models on the corporate side will keep business going and earnings steady.

Yeah, a 20% increase would be nice, and I’d say reasonable, even in today’s market. Besides, there’s more to the name ‘Motley FOOL’ than silly predictions.

By: Joe Smith

Joe Smith — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:10:40 +0000

“woster” I believe you mean “worster”, you taught English? It would be funny if it weren’t the second spelling error, taper has one ‘p’ not two. If you are going to try and be funny with a spelling and/or grammar flame at least check your spelling and grammar.

Ridiculous.

By: Nelson R.

Nelson R. — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:12:35 +0000

That line about 2nd grade grammar was a little harsh on the 2nd graders. I used to teach high school English until I retired 3 years ago and you wouldn’t believe the number of people that are amazed that “woster” isn’t actually a word.