<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is This The BlackBerry 9000?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000</link>
	<description>The Official, Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: alinnible</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-111086</link>
		<dc:creator>alinnible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-111086</guid>
		<description>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alinnible</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-110441</link>
		<dc:creator>alinnible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-110441</guid>
		<description>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-110015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-110015</guid>
		<description>there's a picture of the blackberry 9000, that's silver with a touch screen, i thought that was it? because if it is then i'd really want to purchase one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s a picture of the blackberry 9000, that&#8217;s silver with a touch screen, i thought that was it? because if it is then i&#8217;d really want to purchase one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gift Shop Posters Cards</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-109913</link>
		<dc:creator>Gift Shop Posters Cards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-109913</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Increasing revenue with gift card software...&lt;/strong&gt;

As a business you may be looking for that next "big idea to get you going". While you are looking let me tell you about something that you can do to increase revenue. Gift card software is an add-on to your already existing POS System. It allows you ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Increasing revenue with gift card software&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As a business you may be looking for that next &#8220;big idea to get you going&#8221;. While you are looking let me tell you about something that you can do to increase revenue. Gift card software is an add-on to your already existing POS System. It allows you &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh No! This Is The BlackBerry 9000 Again &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-108292</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh No! This Is The BlackBerry 9000 Again &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-108292</guid>
		<description>[...] when we first saw pictures of what we presumed was the BlackBerry 9000 and thought, &#8220;Oh crap, this thing doesn&#8217;t have a touch-screen.&#8221;, only to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when we first saw pictures of what we presumed was the BlackBerry 9000 and thought, &#8220;Oh crap, this thing doesn&#8217;t have a touch-screen.&#8221;, only to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hellno</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107939</link>
		<dc:creator>hellno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107939</guid>
		<description>Whoa, hold the press!  Robb please mark the date.  Even though it has little to do with the current thread, must say I am in agreement with bluehorseshoe and jhp2 on their thought about M$ devices (after also giving M$ many chances to prove itself, and it's failure to do so) Also agree about the current and ongoing sad state of Palm devices too, though never thought my 650 Palm was anywhere close as good as my 8700 BB...  Now if that 8700 only had a camera, and played as nice with the MacOS.

Not that it matters but why would RIM with the new BB8130 only support TIA-856 Rev A?  It hardly matters though since voda/verizon have already said they are upgrading to GSM/LTE, which is coming soon to break the closed, proprietary cdma chain as industry is moving away from the Qualcomm dominated CDMA air-interface, to the standard, open global GSM family of technologies LTE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, hold the press!  Robb please mark the date.  Even though it has little to do with the current thread, must say I am in agreement with bluehorseshoe and jhp2 on their thought about M$ devices (after also giving M$ many chances to prove itself, and it&#8217;s failure to do so) Also agree about the current and ongoing sad state of Palm devices too, though never thought my 650 Palm was anywhere close as good as my 8700 BB&#8230;  Now if that 8700 only had a camera, and played as nice with the MacOS.</p>
<p>Not that it matters but why would RIM with the new BB8130 only support TIA-856 Rev A?  It hardly matters though since voda/verizon have already said they are upgrading to GSM/LTE, which is coming soon to break the closed, proprietary cdma chain as industry is moving away from the Qualcomm dominated CDMA air-interface, to the standard, open global GSM family of technologies LTE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluehorseshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107937</link>
		<dc:creator>bluehorseshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107937</guid>
		<description>@ jhp2 

Sorry to hear about the switch.  I have the MS devices plenty of chances but they weren't reliable enough.  When the treo 700p came out, I was there day one.  I just don't think they were built for heavy users like myself.  The crashes drove me nuts, and the hanging calls forced me to reset at least once per day.  If there's one thing I give BB is stability.  Not the prettiest OS, but certainly reliable. 

Also forgot to mention it now that you brought it up, the Pearl on VZW runs Rev. A.  Just one of those important features I forgot to include.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jhp2 </p>
<p>Sorry to hear about the switch.  I have the MS devices plenty of chances but they weren&#8217;t reliable enough.  When the treo 700p came out, I was there day one.  I just don&#8217;t think they were built for heavy users like myself.  The crashes drove me nuts, and the hanging calls forced me to reset at least once per day.  If there&#8217;s one thing I give BB is stability.  Not the prettiest OS, but certainly reliable. </p>
<p>Also forgot to mention it now that you brought it up, the Pearl on VZW runs Rev. A.  Just one of those important features I forgot to include.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JHP2</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107935</link>
		<dc:creator>JHP2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107935</guid>
		<description>Blue,

Thanks for the update on the Pearl. I tether on the 7130 and it works well but it is not rev A, so I get right about 400K most of the time. Most of my co-workers that have a Pearl are on the corporate T-Mo plan so tethering really is not an option due to data speeds. I like the trackball idea a lot as I used Treo's for years and when I switched to the BB, I developed one heck of a case of BB thumb. Used to have to ice it nightly so I am glad to have another option. Interestingly, we are no longer going to upgrade the BES at work and are being encouraged to go to Windows devices. Unfortunately, the VZW Q is a toy not a corporate device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue,</p>
<p>Thanks for the update on the Pearl. I tether on the 7130 and it works well but it is not rev A, so I get right about 400K most of the time. Most of my co-workers that have a Pearl are on the corporate T-Mo plan so tethering really is not an option due to data speeds. I like the trackball idea a lot as I used Treo&#8217;s for years and when I switched to the BB, I developed one heck of a case of BB thumb. Used to have to ice it nightly so I am glad to have another option. Interestingly, we are no longer going to upgrade the BES at work and are being encouraged to go to Windows devices. Unfortunately, the VZW Q is a toy not a corporate device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripley</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107934</guid>
		<description>Gheeze!!!  Will one of you just let it go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gheeze!!!  Will one of you just let it go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hellno</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107929</link>
		<dc:creator>hellno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/is-this-the-blackberry-9000#comment-107929</guid>
		<description>Verizon Relents on DUN... Just a Tiny Bit
Submitted by Ed Hardy on Friday, February 03, 2006

Verizon users have been complaining for years that this carrier disables Dial-Up Networking (DUN) on many of the devices it offers.

This means that they can't be used as a wireless modem for other devices, like a laptop.

Now, for the first time, Verizon's hard-line stance has cracked, if only a little bit.

According to PC Magazine, this carrier is now allowing users of just a few of its mobile phones to have access to DUN.

Unfortunately, none of these are Palm OS or Pocket PC models.

And users are expected to pay heavily for the service. It costs $60 a month, on top of any other services one has subscribed to.

Also, users are expected to use a cable, not Bluetooth, although many of them could use this short-range wireless networking standard.

Still, surely many Verizon customers will take this as a sign that the carrier might relent more in the future.

(Those in the know, realize vzw is being forced to allow DUN, as vzw upgrades to the GSM family of technologies)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon Relents on DUN&#8230; Just a Tiny Bit<br />
Submitted by Ed Hardy on Friday, February 03, 2006</p>
<p>Verizon users have been complaining for years that this carrier disables Dial-Up Networking (DUN) on many of the devices it offers.</p>
<p>This means that they can&#8217;t be used as a wireless modem for other devices, like a laptop.</p>
<p>Now, for the first time, Verizon&#8217;s hard-line stance has cracked, if only a little bit.</p>
<p>According to PC Magazine, this carrier is now allowing users of just a few of its mobile phones to have access to DUN.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, none of these are Palm OS or Pocket PC models.</p>
<p>And users are expected to pay heavily for the service. It costs $60 a month, on top of any other services one has subscribed to.</p>
<p>Also, users are expected to use a cable, not Bluetooth, although many of them could use this short-range wireless networking standard.</p>
<p>Still, surely many Verizon customers will take this as a sign that the carrier might relent more in the future.</p>
<p>(Those in the know, realize vzw is being forced to allow DUN, as vzw upgrades to the GSM family of technologies)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
