<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Is the Motorola Q more &#8220;Hip&#8221; than the BlackBerry?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry</link> <description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Robb Dunewood</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry/comment-page-1#comment-12205</link> <dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:47:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=793#comment-12205</guid> <description>The real question, Robert, is what do the 5 users that have Q&#039;s think.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question, Robert, is what do the 5 users that have Q&#8217;s think.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry/comment-page-1#comment-12189</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:30:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=793#comment-12189</guid> <description>Well,being an admin. I have 55 Blackberries linked up to a BES server. I now have
a Good Server as well and 5 of the Q&#039;s.The difference is Mac/PC. Sexy v. Productive.The Q has neat features: Music, Camera, Bluetooth works well. But even with
Goodlink doing realtime sync... I get more done in less time on the Blackberry.Man oh man is it pretty though...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,</p><p>being an admin. I have 55 Blackberries linked up to a BES server. I now have<br
/> a Good Server as well and 5 of the Q&#8217;s.</p><p>The difference is Mac/PC. Sexy v. Productive.</p><p>The Q has neat features: Music, Camera, Bluetooth works well. But even with<br
/> Goodlink doing realtime sync&#8230; I get more done in less time on the Blackberry.</p><p>Man oh man is it pretty though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thought</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry/comment-page-1#comment-10043</link> <dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:56:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=793#comment-10043</guid> <description>I echo the consensus here.  The Q no doubt looks more &quot;hip&quot; on the surface.  The design and weight factor can&#039;t be beat.However, functionality is another thing.  I&#039;ve played with the Q in the Verizon store and it can&#039;t hold a candle to the BB.   As Brendan notes, there is this annoying response lag to your keystrokes.The average consumer will still go for it in a big way, and many will probably really like it, having no other basis for comparison.But the enterprise market in no way will want this device.So on the one hand, RIM has some formidable competition on the consumer side.  But on the other hand, Moto and all others have some fierce competition in the enterprise segment in RIM.The enterprise market is a very nice one to dominate, and in many respects, preferrable to the consumer one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo the consensus here.  The Q no doubt looks more &#8220;hip&#8221; on the surface.  The design and weight factor can&#8217;t be beat.</p><p>However, functionality is another thing.  I&#8217;ve played with the Q in the Verizon store and it can&#8217;t hold a candle to the BB.   As Brendan notes, there is this annoying response lag to your keystrokes.</p><p>The average consumer will still go for it in a big way, and many will probably really like it, having no other basis for comparison.</p><p>But the enterprise market in no way will want this device.</p><p>So on the one hand, RIM has some formidable competition on the consumer side.  But on the other hand, Moto and all others have some fierce competition in the enterprise segment in RIM.</p><p>The enterprise market is a very nice one to dominate, and in many respects, preferrable to the consumer one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brendan M</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry/comment-page-1#comment-10007</link> <dc:creator>Brendan M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:21:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=793#comment-10007</guid> <description>I&#039;m a long-time BB user who has used a range of mail only and phone hybrid devices.  My latest was the 7130e which I&#039;ve used on Verizon&#039;s network since Dec &#039;05.  My company is trying to kill BB usage internally to promot WM5 and its Exchange integration.  I ordered a Q and, after using it for a week, returned it today.I found the Q &#039;theoretically&#039; did everything the BB would, but it simply was not reliable.  It locked up frequently (requiring a battery removal to reset) and was frequently slow to respond to keystrokes.So the Q may look neat... and be &quot;cool.&quot;  But I prefer a stable device which simply works without being prodded.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a long-time BB user who has used a range of mail only and phone hybrid devices.  My latest was the 7130e which I&#8217;ve used on Verizon&#8217;s network since Dec &#8216;05.  My company is trying to kill BB usage internally to promot WM5 and its Exchange integration.  I ordered a Q and, after using it for a week, returned it today.</p><p>I found the Q &#8216;theoretically&#8217; did everything the BB would, but it simply was not reliable.  It locked up frequently (requiring a battery removal to reset) and was frequently slow to respond to keystrokes.</p><p>So the Q may look neat&#8230; and be &#8220;cool.&#8221;  But I prefer a stable device which simply works without being prodded.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nofx</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry/comment-page-1#comment-9997</link> <dc:creator>nofx</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:46:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=793#comment-9997</guid> <description>when its comes to being hip, yes its the sexiest good looking qwerty keyboard out right now. when it comes to pda and phone functionality.... forget about it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when its comes to being hip, yes its the sexiest good looking qwerty keyboard out right now. when it comes to pda and phone functionality&#8230;. forget about it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry/comment-page-1#comment-9948</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=793#comment-9948</guid> <description>Sure it is hipper, because it can download music and ringtones. It doesn&#039;t need extra cost (I think) on top of data plan. Oh did I mention it can play music?Seriously though, I played with a Q for a day and it is pretty dire. Not so good as either a phone, or PDA, or email device. In fact, in trying to do everything it is not good at any. But then, I am not an average consumer either...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure it is hipper, because it can download music and ringtones. It doesn&#8217;t need extra cost (I think) on top of data plan. Oh did I mention it can play music?</p><p>Seriously though, I played with a Q for a day and it is pretty dire. Not so good as either a phone, or PDA, or email device. In fact, in trying to do everything it is not good at any. But then, I am not an average consumer either&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/is-the-motrola-q-more-hip-than-the-blackberry/comment-page-1#comment-9945</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=793#comment-9945</guid> <description>Can you believe that this thing shipped without MSFP / AKU 2.0? It doesn&#039;t even support Exchange push email! That&#039;s a feature that has been available for months.
But it is definitely hipper looking. I think it would be cool for a casual user. However I have not heard kind things about it. Even the user reviews on Amazon have not been good.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you believe that this thing shipped without MSFP / AKU 2.0? It doesn&#8217;t even support Exchange push email! That&#8217;s a feature that has been available for months.<br
/> But it is definitely hipper looking. I think it would be cool for a casual user. However I have not heard kind things about it. Even the user reviews on Amazon have not been good.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.rimarkable.com @ 2010-03-22 07:59:18 -->