<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: iPhone Unlocking That Really Works:  AT&amp;T Must Be Ticked Off</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off</link> <description>The Official, Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Bobby</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/comment-page-1#comment-125138</link> <dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:57:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1478#comment-125138</guid> <description>The easiest software to unlock your iPhone is http://softunlock.comIt works and it is free.*thumbs up*</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The easiest software to unlock your iPhone is <a
href="http://softunlock.com" rel="nofollow">http://softunlock.com</a></p><p>It works and it is free.</p><p>*thumbs up*</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blogs 07/36</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/comment-page-1#comment-100435</link> <dc:creator>Blogs 07/36</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 00:34:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1478#comment-100435</guid> <description>[...] iPhone Unlocking That Really Works: AT&amp;T Must Be Ticked Off funciona el desbloqueo del iphone [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPhone Unlocking That Really Works: AT&amp;T Must Be Ticked Off funciona el desbloqueo del iphone [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Did AT&#38;T Get Played By Apple? &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/comment-page-1#comment-98920</link> <dc:creator>Did AT&#38;T Get Played By Apple? &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:52:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1478#comment-98920</guid> <description>[...] the hoopla surrounding the iPhone and unlocking it from AT&amp;T? We just blogged about the first software based iPhone SIM unlock the other day. Today there are least 4 verified iPhone unlocking hacks out there and you bet there [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the hoopla surrounding the iPhone and unlocking it from AT&#38;T? We just blogged about the first software based iPhone SIM unlock the other day. Today there are least 4 verified iPhone unlocking hacks out there and you bet there [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hellno</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/comment-page-1#comment-98816</link> <dc:creator>hellno</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:16:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1478#comment-98816</guid> <description>MacDailyNews Take: It&#039;s long been obvious to most that iPhone would be unlocked; it was just a matter of time. So, of course, Jobs knew, after all, he&#039;s like Josh Waitzkin on steroids: so many moves ahead it&#039;s scary. Whether Jobs wants an unlocked iPhone or not, only he could say, but watching him toy with doofuses like Microsoft&#039;s Ballmer, Verizon&#039;s Denny Strigl, Real&#039;s Glaser, et al. is so fun it borders on the criminal.http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/14724/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacDailyNews Take: It&#8217;s long been obvious to most that iPhone would be unlocked; it was just a matter of time. So, of course, Jobs knew, after all, he&#8217;s like Josh Waitzkin on steroids: so many moves ahead it&#8217;s scary. Whether Jobs wants an unlocked iPhone or not, only he could say, but watching him toy with doofuses like Microsoft&#8217;s Ballmer, Verizon&#8217;s Denny Strigl, Real&#8217;s Glaser, et al. is so fun it borders on the criminal.</p><p><a
href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/14724/" rel="nofollow">http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/14724/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joed</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/comment-page-1#comment-98733</link> <dc:creator>Joed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:38:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1478#comment-98733</guid> <description>Too bad there is no real keyboard and the dam thing is only 2g http://www.myeclinic.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad there is no real keyboard and the dam thing is only 2g <a
href="http://www.myeclinic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.myeclinic.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hellno</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/comment-page-1#comment-98297</link> <dc:creator>hellno</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:18:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1478#comment-98297</guid> <description>He&#039;s completely within the law to do what he did.As per the US copy right office.http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061124-8280.html&quot;Exemptions are allowed for: cell phone firmware that ties a phone to a specific wireless network&quot;&quot;The provision likely to be of most interest to consumers is the one allowing cell phones to be unlocked and used on other networks. The Copyright Office allowed this exception because the software that prohibits users from accessing their phone&#039;s firmware has little to do with copyright and much to do with a business model. &quot;The underlying activity sought to be performed by the owner of the handset is to allow the handset to do what it was manufactured to do—lawfully connect to any carrier,&quot; writes the government in explanation. &quot;This is a noninfringing activity by the user... The purpose of the software lock appears to be limited to restricting the owner’s use of the mobile handset to support a business model, rather than to protect access to a copyrighted work itself.&quot;Hope the FCC would take this a step further and outlaw service providers locking consumer wireless devices, taking away consumer freedom.http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/11/unlocked_cells.html&quot;By Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.ComNovember 25, 2006
Of the many ways cell phone carriers gouge consumers, one of the most egregious is making it impossible to take your phone with you when you switch to a new provider.Moving your phone between carriers has been considered an infringement of the old carrier&#039;s property rights, so customers were forced to turn in or junk their old phones, and pay all sorts of extra fees to get a new phone along with their new plan.But beginning in December, U.S. copyright law provides an exemption for consumers who want to &quot;unlock&quot; their cellphones and take them along when switching providers.The exemption was one of six announced as part of regular revisions to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA), the 800-pound-gorilla of technology-related copyright law in the U.S.The ruling by the U.S. Copyright Office stated that the &quot;software lock&quot; preventing customers from using the same phone with different carriers &quot;appears to be limited to restricting the owner&#039;s use of the mobile handset to support a business model, rather than to protect access to a copyrighted work itself.&quot;&quot;The underlying activity sought to be performed by the owner of the handset is to allow the handset to do what it was manufactured to do -- lawfully connect to any carrier. This is a noninfringing activity by the user,&quot; said Chief Register Marybeth Peters.Wireless carriers typically lure customers with the promise of rebates and instant savings for new phones, but only if they sign multi-year contracts with heavy termination fees. The new phone also often comes with a &quot;handset activation fee,&quot; which negates much of the customers&#039; savings.Unlocked phones that are not attached to any carrier are often prohibitively expensive, sometimes costing double what they would with a new carrier contract.Selling unlocked cellphones on auction sites such as eBay has been a booming &quot;grey market,&quot; and has earned the wrath of the wireless industry. Wireless lobby association CTIA and prepaid phone company TracFone both submitted unsolicited statements opposing the exemption.The Register&#039;s office criticized CTIA and TracFone for not submitting their statements in the time allowed.&quot;Not only would acceptance of the late filings wreak havoc on the decisionmaking process, but it also would be fundamentally unfair to the parties who have made timely submissions, and in particular to the proponents of the exemption.&quot;The exemption for unlocked cellphones will last three years, until the next time the Copyright Office reexamines the DMCA for potential new exemptions.Supporters of the exemptions are pinning their hopes on the new Democratic Congress supporting legislation to reform the DMCA and make the exemptions permanent, although the Democratic record of appeasing the telecommunications industry is not less unseemly than the GOP&#039;s.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s completely within the law to do what he did.</p><p>As per the US copy right office.</p><p><a
href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061124-8280.html" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061124-8280.html</a></p><p>&#8220;Exemptions are allowed for: cell phone firmware that ties a phone to a specific wireless network&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;The provision likely to be of most interest to consumers is the one allowing cell phones to be unlocked and used on other networks. The Copyright Office allowed this exception because the software that prohibits users from accessing their phone&#8217;s firmware has little to do with copyright and much to do with a business model. &#8220;The underlying activity sought to be performed by the owner of the handset is to allow the handset to do what it was manufactured to do—lawfully connect to any carrier,&#8221; writes the government in explanation. &#8220;This is a noninfringing activity by the user&#8230; The purpose of the software lock appears to be limited to restricting the owner’s use of the mobile handset to support a business model, rather than to protect access to a copyrighted work itself.&#8221;</p><p>Hope the FCC would take this a step further and outlaw service providers locking consumer wireless devices, taking away consumer freedom.</p><p><a
href="http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/11/unlocked_cells.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/11/unlocked_cells.html</a></p><p>&#8220;By Martin H. Bosworth<br
/> ConsumerAffairs.Com</p><p>November 25, 2006<br
/> Of the many ways cell phone carriers gouge consumers, one of the most egregious is making it impossible to take your phone with you when you switch to a new provider.</p><p>Moving your phone between carriers has been considered an infringement of the old carrier&#8217;s property rights, so customers were forced to turn in or junk their old phones, and pay all sorts of extra fees to get a new phone along with their new plan.</p><p>But beginning in December, U.S. copyright law provides an exemption for consumers who want to &#8220;unlock&#8221; their cellphones and take them along when switching providers.</p><p>The exemption was one of six announced as part of regular revisions to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA), the 800-pound-gorilla of technology-related copyright law in the U.S.</p><p>The ruling by the U.S. Copyright Office stated that the &#8220;software lock&#8221; preventing customers from using the same phone with different carriers &#8220;appears to be limited to restricting the owner&#8217;s use of the mobile handset to support a business model, rather than to protect access to a copyrighted work itself.&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;The underlying activity sought to be performed by the owner of the handset is to allow the handset to do what it was manufactured to do &#8212; lawfully connect to any carrier. This is a noninfringing activity by the user,&#8221; said Chief Register Marybeth Peters.</p><p>Wireless carriers typically lure customers with the promise of rebates and instant savings for new phones, but only if they sign multi-year contracts with heavy termination fees. The new phone also often comes with a &#8220;handset activation fee,&#8221; which negates much of the customers&#8217; savings.</p><p>Unlocked phones that are not attached to any carrier are often prohibitively expensive, sometimes costing double what they would with a new carrier contract.</p><p>Selling unlocked cellphones on auction sites such as eBay has been a booming &#8220;grey market,&#8221; and has earned the wrath of the wireless industry. Wireless lobby association CTIA and prepaid phone company TracFone both submitted unsolicited statements opposing the exemption.</p><p>The Register&#8217;s office criticized CTIA and TracFone for not submitting their statements in the time allowed.</p><p>&#8220;Not only would acceptance of the late filings wreak havoc on the decisionmaking process, but it also would be fundamentally unfair to the parties who have made timely submissions, and in particular to the proponents of the exemption.&#8221;</p><p>The exemption for unlocked cellphones will last three years, until the next time the Copyright Office reexamines the DMCA for potential new exemptions.</p><p>Supporters of the exemptions are pinning their hopes on the new Democratic Congress supporting legislation to reform the DMCA and make the exemptions permanent, although the Democratic record of appeasing the telecommunications industry is not less unseemly than the GOP&#8217;s.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/comment-page-1#comment-98288</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:51:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1478#comment-98288</guid> <description>Unlocking phones in the USA has already been ruled OK by US courts and is one of the 6 exemptions to the DMCA&quot;Exemptions are allowed for 1) the educational library of a university&#039;s media studies department, in order to watch film clips in class; 2) using computer software that requires the original disks or hardware in order to run; 3) dongle-protected computer programs, if the the dongle no longer functions and a replacement cannot be found; 4) protected e-books, in order to use screen-reader software; 5) cell phone firmware that ties a phone to a specific wireless network; and 6) DRM software included on audio CDs, but only when such software creates security vulnerabilities on personal computers.&quot;Hack away guys.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlocking phones in the USA has already been ruled OK by US courts and is one of the 6 exemptions to the DMCA</p><p>&#8220;Exemptions are allowed for 1) the educational library of a university&#8217;s media studies department, in order to watch film clips in class; 2) using computer software that requires the original disks or hardware in order to run; 3) dongle-protected computer programs, if the the dongle no longer functions and a replacement cannot be found; 4) protected e-books, in order to use screen-reader software; 5) cell phone firmware that ties a phone to a specific wireless network; and 6) DRM software included on audio CDs, but only when such software creates security vulnerabilities on personal computers.&#8221;</p><p>Hack away guys.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gquaglia</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/iphone-unlocking-that-really-works-att-must-be-ticked-off/comment-page-1#comment-98268</link> <dc:creator>gquaglia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1478#comment-98268</guid> <description>Hope this guy has a good lawyer because Apple and AT&amp;T will be coming down on this guy hard.  I&#039;m sure he violated some part of the ridiculous DMCA in the process.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope this guy has a good lawyer because Apple and AT&amp;T will be coming down on this guy hard.  I&#8217;m sure he violated some part of the ridiculous DMCA in the process.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: webserver.rimarkable.com @ 2009-11-08 06:20:43 by W3 Total Cache -->