<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Samsung Know There Would Be Trademark Trouble Over The Name BlackJack?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/did-samsung-know-there-would-be-trademark-trouble-over-the-name-blackjack/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/did-samsung-know-there-would-be-trademark-trouble-over-the-name-blackjack</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/did-samsung-know-there-would-be-trademark-trouble-over-the-name-blackjack/comment-page-1#comment-37311</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1092#comment-37311</guid>
		<description>The BlackJack is called the SGH-i320 in the UK.  There is no question that Samsung named this device BlackJack to capture attention of those looking at the already established BlackBerry.

As for Cisco using the name iPhone.  They bought a company in 2000 that owned the trademark on the name, a play off of internet phone, from before that iPod existed.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1110&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cisco is actually suing Apple for trademark infringement &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BlackJack is called the SGH-i320 in the UK.  There is no question that Samsung named this device BlackJack to capture attention of those looking at the already established BlackBerry.</p>
<p>As for Cisco using the name iPhone.  They bought a company in 2000 that owned the trademark on the name, a play off of internet phone, from before that iPod existed.  <a href="http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1110" title="" rel="nofollow">Cisco is actually suing Apple for trademark infringement </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7egend</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/did-samsung-know-there-would-be-trademark-trouble-over-the-name-blackjack/comment-page-1#comment-37296</link>
		<dc:creator>7egend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/archives/1092#comment-37296</guid>
		<description>You know it takessometime for research and development to design and test a phone, which might have been around the time that the poker craze hit everyone that might be the reason they named the phone the blackjack to kinda ride the wave of poker enthuist that might buy a smartphone, not the fact that the crackberry is the number one smart phone.  just my 2 cents.  kinda like cisco using the name iphone playing off the ipod, if the blackberry cause is plausible wouldn&#039;t apple be able to counter sue cisco for using the trendy &quot;i&quot; infront of the word phone?  think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it takessometime for research and development to design and test a phone, which might have been around the time that the poker craze hit everyone that might be the reason they named the phone the blackjack to kinda ride the wave of poker enthuist that might buy a smartphone, not the fact that the crackberry is the number one smart phone.  just my 2 cents.  kinda like cisco using the name iphone playing off the ipod, if the blackberry cause is plausible wouldn&#8217;t apple be able to counter sue cisco for using the trendy &#8220;i&#8221; infront of the word phone?  think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

