<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Palm&#8217;s New OS &#8220;Nova&#8221; Save The Company?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company</link>
	<description>The Official, Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:09:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company/comment-page-1#comment-118877</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3113#comment-118877</guid>
		<description>If the New OS is backwards compatible with existing software, I think PALM has a shot.  The one thing PALM does have going for it, BTW I disagree with Richard, the back bone of PALM OS is much better than the backbone of RIM&#039;S phones.  RIM is great for corporate use but when it comes to consumer phones, the features that made it perfect for corporation, IE security became a hassle, and increase cost of innovation for software developers.

Palm doesn&#039;t have that problem and they have 15+ years of 3rd party software development to add to the phone.

With some new phones and a NEW OS, I think they can win back a market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the New OS is backwards compatible with existing software, I think PALM has a shot.  The one thing PALM does have going for it, BTW I disagree with Richard, the back bone of PALM OS is much better than the backbone of RIM&#8217;S phones.  RIM is great for corporate use but when it comes to consumer phones, the features that made it perfect for corporation, IE security became a hassle, and increase cost of innovation for software developers.</p>
<p>Palm doesn&#8217;t have that problem and they have 15+ years of 3rd party software development to add to the phone.</p>
<p>With some new phones and a NEW OS, I think they can win back a market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company/comment-page-1#comment-118833</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3113#comment-118833</guid>
		<description>I probably should ask the question &quot;Could Android Save Palm?&quot;

I would put a post up asking that question but I don&#039;t want to upset Froto too much :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably should ask the question &#8220;Could Android Save Palm?&#8221;</p>
<p>I would put a post up asking that question but I don&#8217;t want to upset Froto too much <img src='http://www.rimarkable.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company/comment-page-1#comment-118826</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3113#comment-118826</guid>
		<description>Palm is done for. Its handsets aren&#039;t innovated enough for them to continue to stay afloat and its Operating System is a joke. What ever happened to the Linux-based Palms we heard about years ago? Palm keeps on promising change and then throws crap at us like the Centro.

Epic fail in the PALM of your hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palm is done for. Its handsets aren&#8217;t innovated enough for them to continue to stay afloat and its Operating System is a joke. What ever happened to the Linux-based Palms we heard about years ago? Palm keeps on promising change and then throws crap at us like the Centro.</p>
<p>Epic fail in the PALM of your hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company/comment-page-1#comment-118824</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3113#comment-118824</guid>
		<description>@Norman R.

I was thinking the same thing.  John Fortt wrote an article about Palm devices running Android on &lt;a href=&quot;http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/10/01/why-palm-needs-android/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fortune.com&lt;/a&gt; a few months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Norman R.</p>
<p>I was thinking the same thing.  John Fortt wrote an article about Palm devices running Android on <a href="http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/10/01/why-palm-needs-android/" rel="nofollow">Fortune.com</a> a few months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman R.</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company/comment-page-1#comment-118822</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3113#comment-118822</guid>
		<description>Froto... Your an idiot...

Can Nova save Palm?  Save is such a strong word.  It will help, however, I think that that Palm needs to do something like come out with a line of devices that run Android or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Froto&#8230; Your an idiot&#8230;</p>
<p>Can Nova save Palm?  Save is such a strong word.  It will help, however, I think that that Palm needs to do something like come out with a line of devices that run Android or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company/comment-page-1#comment-118819</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3113#comment-118819</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should try www.blackberry.com or www.rim.com.  I hear that all those sites talk about is BlackBerry all the time.

They are free even...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should try <a href="http://www.blackberry.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackberry.com</a> or <a href="http://www.rim.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rim.com</a>.  I hear that all those sites talk about is BlackBerry all the time.</p>
<p>They are free even&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Froto</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/can-palms-new-os-nova-save-the-company/comment-page-1#comment-118818</link>
		<dc:creator>Froto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=3113#comment-118818</guid>
		<description>Why are you talking about Palm on a BlackBerry site?  If I wanted to read about palm, I would go to a blog about Palm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you talking about Palm on a BlackBerry site?  If I wanted to read about palm, I would go to a blog about Palm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
