<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: BlackBerry Storm 2 Browser On Wi-Fi&#8230;  I&#8217;m Not Impressed</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-storm-2-browser-on-wi-fi-im-not-impressed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-storm-2-browser-on-wi-fi-im-not-impressed</link> <description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Gadgets</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-storm-2-browser-on-wi-fi-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1#comment-125357</link> <dc:creator>Gadgets</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=6513#comment-125357</guid> <description>Still it is nice peace. Yes, it is slow but does job done.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still it is nice peace. Yes, it is slow but does job done.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Rock</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-storm-2-browser-on-wi-fi-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1#comment-125245</link> <dc:creator>The Rock</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:22:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=6513#comment-125245</guid> <description>RIM why no standard HTML browser yet?  Sad to see that the Storm2 or any other BB is still horribly out of date, when will the OS software and UI be upgraded?  Perhaps the BB servers can&#039;t handle standard HTML??????</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIM why no standard HTML browser yet?  Sad to see that the Storm2 or any other BB is still horribly out of date, when will the OS software and UI be upgraded?  Perhaps the BB servers can&#8217;t handle standard HTML??????</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DeadOnallfours</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-storm-2-browser-on-wi-fi-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1#comment-125244</link> <dc:creator>DeadOnallfours</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:15:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=6513#comment-125244</guid> <description>When Verizon Releases LTE 4G, WiFi won&#039;t be needed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Verizon Releases LTE 4G, WiFi won&#8217;t be needed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LarryMcJ</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-storm-2-browser-on-wi-fi-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1#comment-125230</link> <dc:creator>LarryMcJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:27:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=6513#comment-125230</guid> <description>Why are associating the Storm 2 with the BB model number of 9520?  9520 is the Storm 1 and the Storm 2 is 9550.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are associating the Storm 2 with the BB model number of 9520?  9520 is the Storm 1 and the Storm 2 is 9550.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AJS</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-storm-2-browser-on-wi-fi-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1#comment-125212</link> <dc:creator>AJS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:07:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=6513#comment-125212</guid> <description>Yep... it still sucks. Clunky, slow and NOT smooth.
And how about regular HTML pages? I didn&#039;t see any of those pulled up on the Strom2. I wonder why.
Also, is that really a WiFi connection? Looks to be the same response times as a 3G connection.
No upgrade for me thank you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230; it still sucks. Clunky, slow and NOT smooth.<br
/> And how about regular HTML pages? I didn&#8217;t see any of those pulled up on the Strom2. I wonder why.<br
/> Also, is that really a WiFi connection? Looks to be the same response times as a 3G connection.<br
/> No upgrade for me thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CJ</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-storm-2-browser-on-wi-fi-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1#comment-125208</link> <dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:03:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=6513#comment-125208</guid> <description>We all know the browser is about the same so that would make the speed issues a network issue most likely.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the browser is about the same so that would make the speed issues a network issue most likely.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.rimarkable.com @ 2010-03-20 06:56:40 -->