<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: BlackBerry Niagara:  The 3G-Less BlackBerry 9000</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000</link> <description>The Official, Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Lets Clear Up The BlackBerry Niagara BlackBerry Javelin Confusion &#124; RIMarkable</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-113107</link> <dc:creator>Lets Clear Up The BlackBerry Niagara BlackBerry Javelin Confusion &#124; RIMarkable</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:11:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-113107</guid> <description>[...] yesterday we wrote a post about the 3G-less BlackBerry 9000 code named the BlackBerry Niagara. At least we thought it was code named the BlackBerry Niagara. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yesterday we wrote a post about the 3G-less BlackBerry 9000 code named the BlackBerry Niagara. At least we thought it was code named the BlackBerry Niagara. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thought</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-113043</link> <dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:23:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-113043</guid> <description>I just don&#039;t get the purpose for this release if it doesn&#039;t have 3G.I agree with Robb...the keyboard seems a step backward.  And even if one considers the design to be a little nicer, then it still doesn&#039;t make much sense...it need some larger leap forward to justify it&#039;s existence in the product line.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get the purpose for this release if it doesn&#8217;t have 3G.</p><p>I agree with Robb&#8230;the keyboard seems a step backward.  And even if one considers the design to be a little nicer, then it still doesn&#8217;t make much sense&#8230;it need some larger leap forward to justify it&#8217;s existence in the product line.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jason</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-112991</link> <dc:creator>jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:19:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-112991</guid> <description>I like the aesthetics of it. It reminds me of a mixture between a bb 7130c and moto q9, but the keyboard doesn&#039;t look real condusive with banging out long emails. I loved my 7130c and miss the looks of it. Really that&#039;s the only the reason I like this device. The 8700 and 8300 series devices are the epitome of blackberry design at its perfection, in my opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the aesthetics of it. It reminds me of a mixture between a bb 7130c and moto q9, but the keyboard doesn&#8217;t look real condusive with banging out long emails. I loved my 7130c and miss the looks of it. Really that&#8217;s the only the reason I like this device. The 8700 and 8300 series devices are the epitome of blackberry design at its perfection, in my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: johnnyheff</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-112984</link> <dc:creator>johnnyheff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:54:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-112984</guid> <description>...i think it still looks sharp.  keyboard aside...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;i think it still looks sharp.  keyboard aside&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kells</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-112980</link> <dc:creator>Kells</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:22:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-112980</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know Robb, I kind of like how this one looks.  I can understand about the keyboard thing though.  My husband prefers his 8730 over the 8830 because of how close the keys are to each other on the 8830.I have small hands so it doesn&#039;t bother me much.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Robb, I kind of like how this one looks.  I can understand about the keyboard thing though.  My husband prefers his 8730 over the 8830 because of how close the keys are to each other on the 8830.</p><p>I have small hands so it doesn&#8217;t bother me much.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg B</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-112979</link> <dc:creator>Greg B</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:15:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-112979</guid> <description>Couldn&#039;t agree more. IMO, the Curve just looks so much better. I don&#039;t know what they were thinking with this one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. IMO, the Curve just looks so much better. I don&#8217;t know what they were thinking with this one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: webserver.rimarkable.com @ 2009-11-08 04:52:12 by W3 Total Cache -->