<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackBerry Niagara:  The 3G-Less BlackBerry 9000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000</link>
	<description>The Official, Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:28:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lets Clear Up The BlackBerry Niagara BlackBerry Javelin Confusion &#124; RIMarkable</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-113107</link>
		<dc:creator>Lets Clear Up The BlackBerry Niagara BlackBerry Javelin Confusion &#124; RIMarkable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-113107</guid>
		<description>[...] yesterday we wrote a post about the 3G-less BlackBerry 9000 code named the BlackBerry Niagara. At least we thought it was code named the BlackBerry Niagara. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yesterday we wrote a post about the 3G-less BlackBerry 9000 code named the BlackBerry Niagara. At least we thought it was code named the BlackBerry Niagara. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-113043</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-113043</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get the purpose for this release if it doesn&#039;t have 3G.  

I agree with Robb...the keyboard seems a step backward.  And even if one considers the design to be a little nicer, then it still doesn&#039;t make much sense...it need some larger leap forward to justify it&#039;s existence in the product line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get the purpose for this release if it doesn&#8217;t have 3G.  </p>
<p>I agree with Robb&#8230;the keyboard seems a step backward.  And even if one considers the design to be a little nicer, then it still doesn&#8217;t make much sense&#8230;it need some larger leap forward to justify it&#8217;s existence in the product line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-112991</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-112991</guid>
		<description>I like the aesthetics of it. It reminds me of a mixture between a bb 7130c and moto q9, but the keyboard doesn&#039;t look real condusive with banging out long emails. I loved my 7130c and miss the looks of it. Really that&#039;s the only the reason I like this device. The 8700 and 8300 series devices are the epitome of blackberry design at its perfection, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the aesthetics of it. It reminds me of a mixture between a bb 7130c and moto q9, but the keyboard doesn&#8217;t look real condusive with banging out long emails. I loved my 7130c and miss the looks of it. Really that&#8217;s the only the reason I like this device. The 8700 and 8300 series devices are the epitome of blackberry design at its perfection, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyheff</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-112984</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnyheff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-112984</guid>
		<description>...i think it still looks sharp.  keyboard aside...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;i think it still looks sharp.  keyboard aside&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kells</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-112980</link>
		<dc:creator>Kells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-112980</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know Robb, I kind of like how this one looks.  I can understand about the keyboard thing though.  My husband prefers his 8730 over the 8830 because of how close the keys are to each other on the 8830.

I have small hands so it doesn&#039;t bother me much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Robb, I kind of like how this one looks.  I can understand about the keyboard thing though.  My husband prefers his 8730 over the 8830 because of how close the keys are to each other on the 8830.</p>
<p>I have small hands so it doesn&#8217;t bother me much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg B</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000/comment-page-1#comment-112979</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-niagara-the-3g-less-blackberry-9000#comment-112979</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more. IMO, the Curve just looks so much better. I don&#039;t know what they were thinking with this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. IMO, the Curve just looks so much better. I don&#8217;t know what they were thinking with this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
