<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: BlackBerry Gemini Picture Surfaces</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-gemini-picture-surfaces/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-gemini-picture-surfaces</link> <description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-gemini-picture-surfaces/comment-page-1#comment-120749</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:00:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=4011#comment-120749</guid> <description>Ahh I see. Not a bad idea though if you want to create different levels of blackberry ownership. That way, it increases the chance for someone to get a blackberry at a starting level such as the gemini incase they cannot afford, what I would say the more complete package.Not a bad marketing idea at all. More BB&#039;s available for EVERYONE.These are just my assumptions of their plan...I remember hearing about the gemini like a year ago and thought the idea fell off. Wasn&#039;t aware it would be a cheaper version.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh I see. Not a bad idea though if you want to create different levels of blackberry ownership. That way, it increases the chance for someone to get a blackberry at a starting level such as the gemini incase they cannot afford, what I would say the more complete package.</p><p>Not a bad marketing idea at all. More BB&#8217;s available for EVERYONE.</p><p>These are just my assumptions of their plan&#8230;I remember hearing about the gemini like a year ago and thought the idea fell off. Wasn&#8217;t aware it would be a cheaper version.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bluehorseshoe</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-gemini-picture-surfaces/comment-page-1#comment-120748</link> <dc:creator>bluehorseshoe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:56:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=4011#comment-120748</guid> <description>@ tedThis model is in the 8000 series and doesn&#039;t carry 3g, so it wouldn&#039;t be a successor to the Bold.  It&#039;s basically a cheaper alternative to the Bold.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ted</p><p>This model is in the 8000 series and doesn&#8217;t carry 3g, so it wouldn&#8217;t be a successor to the Bold.  It&#8217;s basically a cheaper alternative to the Bold.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-gemini-picture-surfaces/comment-page-1#comment-120746</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:18:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=4011#comment-120746</guid> <description>looks sleek, not that different from a 8900 from my perspective. I&#039;m assuming this will be the bold successor?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks sleek, not that different from a 8900 from my perspective. I&#8217;m assuming this will be the bold successor?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.rimarkable.com @ 2010-03-21 00:32:18 -->