<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackBerry Bold 9870 Running BlackBerry 6 Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-bold-9870-running-blackberry-6-images/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-bold-9870-running-blackberry-6-images</link>
	<description>The Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-bold-9870-running-blackberry-6-images/comment-page-1#comment-141803</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14649#comment-141803</guid>
		<description>What is wrong wives the top
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is wrong wives the top</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthmonger</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-bold-9870-running-blackberry-6-images/comment-page-1#comment-132951</link>
		<dc:creator>truthmonger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14649#comment-132951</guid>
		<description>Why not a full gb of RAM, or at least 2gb of built-in storage? And a bit more processor?  RIM seems happy to let other smartphone platforms deliver the same capabilities and a lot more power for the money.  At this rate their market leader status will quickly fade into memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not a full gb of RAM, or at least 2gb of built-in storage? And a bit more processor?  RIM seems happy to let other smartphone platforms deliver the same capabilities and a lot more power for the money.  At this rate their market leader status will quickly fade into memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ja2bk</title>
		<link>http://www.rimarkable.com/blackberry-bold-9870-running-blackberry-6-images/comment-page-1#comment-131551</link>
		<dc:creator>ja2bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/?p=14649#comment-131551</guid>
		<description>I imagine most things would work as today, but you would see the background when you hit the BB button instead of the current default black/blue.  You would just slide across with the keypad (or trackball should it work on older models...not seeming likely though) to go across to the different screens.   I think we could see how a non-touchscreen would work if, when they made those leak videos, they also used the trackpad to demo things.  I&#039;m more curious as to how the browser would function for zooming in and out.  That probably wouldn&#039;t change either from today (I to zoom in and O to zoom out)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine most things would work as today, but you would see the background when you hit the BB button instead of the current default black/blue.  You would just slide across with the keypad (or trackball should it work on older models&#8230;not seeming likely though) to go across to the different screens.   I think we could see how a non-touchscreen would work if, when they made those leak videos, they also used the trackpad to demo things.  I&#8217;m more curious as to how the browser would function for zooming in and out.  That probably wouldn&#8217;t change either from today (I to zoom in and O to zoom out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

