<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Still Testing The BlackBerry Bold</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold</link> <description>The Official, Unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: CBlackberryNY</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold/comment-page-1#comment-117377</link> <dc:creator>CBlackberryNY</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:52:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold#comment-117377</guid> <description>Careful RIM, your being replaced.iPhone smashes sales goals, AT&amp;T rakes in subscribers
http://www.iphonematters.com/article/iphone_smashes_sales_goals_att_rakes_in_subscribers_064/#When:15:36:00Z
&quot;That gives AT&amp;T a net gain of 8.4 million subscribers.&quot;One in three iPhone 3G customers ditch their carriers
http://www.macworld.com/article/135927/2008/10/iphone_switchers.html?lsrc=rss_weblogs_iphonecentral&quot;Defectors from Verizon led the charge to the iPhone 3G, with 47 percent of those switchers; T-Mobile followed at 24 percent and Sprint grabbed the bronze at 19 percent.&quot;&quot;During the June through August period, the iPhone 3G was the top-seller in the smartphone category, beating out competition from RIM and Palm. According to NPD, the iPhone 3G has boosted the iPhone’s market share from 11 percent before the new model’s introduction to 17 percent as of the end of August.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful RIM, your being replaced.</p><p>iPhone smashes sales goals, AT&amp;T rakes in subscribers<br
/> <a
href="http://www.iphonematters.com/article/iphone_smashes_sales_goals_att_rakes_in_subscribers_064/#When:15:36:00Z" rel="nofollow">http://www.iphonematters.com/article/iphone_smashes_sales_goals_att_rakes_in_subscribers_064/#When:15:36:00Z</a><br
/> &#8220;That gives AT&amp;T a net gain of 8.4 million subscribers.&#8221;</p><p>One in three iPhone 3G customers ditch their carriers<br
/> <a
href="http://www.macworld.com/article/135927/2008/10/iphone_switchers.html?lsrc=rss_weblogs_iphonecentral" rel="nofollow">http://www.macworld.com/article/135927/2008/10/iphone_switchers.html?lsrc=rss_weblogs_iphonecentral</a></p><p>&#8220;Defectors from Verizon led the charge to the iPhone 3G, with 47 percent of those switchers; T-Mobile followed at 24 percent and Sprint grabbed the bronze at 19 percent.&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;During the June through August period, the iPhone 3G was the top-seller in the smartphone category, beating out competition from RIM and Palm. According to NPD, the iPhone 3G has boosted the iPhone’s market share from 11 percent before the new model’s introduction to 17 percent as of the end of August.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sean76</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold/comment-page-1#comment-117364</link> <dc:creator>Sean76</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:40:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold#comment-117364</guid> <description>I&#039;m happily waiting for the Storm on Verizon. Done with at&amp;t, as a matter in fact there service is terrible over the last 6 months anyway. Goin back, and stayin with Verizon for good. Bold is such old news, especially when the rest of the world has had it for a couple of months already...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happily waiting for the Storm on Verizon. Done with at&amp;t, as a matter in fact there service is terrible over the last 6 months anyway. Goin back, and stayin with Verizon for good. Bold is such old news, especially when the rest of the world has had it for a couple of months already&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thought</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold/comment-page-1#comment-117346</link> <dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:08:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold#comment-117346</guid> <description>By the time the Bold is released on ATT it very well may seem to be yesterday&#039;s news.  The world of technology moves very fast, and RIM/ATT has botched this release about as bad as can be imagined.I imagine Verizon is plenty happy about this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the time the Bold is released on ATT it very well may seem to be yesterday&#8217;s news.  The world of technology moves very fast, and RIM/ATT has botched this release about as bad as can be imagined.</p><p>I imagine Verizon is plenty happy about this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: millerm3113</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold/comment-page-1#comment-117343</link> <dc:creator>millerm3113</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:26:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold#comment-117343</guid> <description>Bought the 3g iPhone 2day. All the blackberry delays cost them atleast 1 crackberry customer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought the 3g iPhone 2day. All the blackberry delays cost them atleast 1 crackberry customer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gquaglia</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold/comment-page-1#comment-117342</link> <dc:creator>gquaglia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:45:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold#comment-117342</guid> <description>I predict the Storm will be out before the Bold and will capture all the media.  There is really nothing special about the Bold anyway and its too damn big!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict the Storm will be out before the Bold and will capture all the media.  There is really nothing special about the Bold anyway and its too damn big!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thought</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold/comment-page-1#comment-117341</link> <dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:15:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold#comment-117341</guid> <description>By letting the release of the Bold slip so much, now when it is released it might be overshadowed by the BB Storm release anyway.It will be a real coup for VZW to come out with the Storm before ATT launches the Bold.As for this rumor about the iPhone hogging data, I don&#039;t buy it.  If the Bold uses so much less bandwidth, what&#039;s the problem anyway?  You see you can turn that number around and argue that the Bold should have no problems if it uses 1/20 the data bandwidth.  At that rate, adding a few more weeks of iPhone sales should pose more problems to a crowded network than the Bold would.However, I doubt that statistic is true anyway...it seems kind of fishy to me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By letting the release of the Bold slip so much, now when it is released it might be overshadowed by the BB Storm release anyway.</p><p>It will be a real coup for VZW to come out with the Storm before ATT launches the Bold.</p><p>As for this rumor about the iPhone hogging data, I don&#8217;t buy it.  If the Bold uses so much less bandwidth, what&#8217;s the problem anyway?  You see you can turn that number around and argue that the Bold should have no problems if it uses 1/20 the data bandwidth.  At that rate, adding a few more weeks of iPhone sales should pose more problems to a crowded network than the Bold would.</p><p>However, I doubt that statistic is true anyway&#8230;it seems kind of fishy to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Grammar Police</title><link>http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold/comment-page-1#comment-117340</link> <dc:creator>Grammar Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rimarkable.com/att-still-testing-the-blackberry-bold#comment-117340</guid> <description>Anything to the rumor that the iPhone uses 20x the data it should with its &quot;ping pong&quot; implementation and hasn&#039;t left any room for the Bold.I&#039;ve been following this and haven&#039;t seen anything about AT&amp;T screwing up its implementation...  Please point us to evidence.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything to the rumor that the iPhone uses 20x the data it should with its &#8220;ping pong&#8221; implementation and hasn&#8217;t left any room for the Bold.</p><p>I&#8217;ve been following this and haven&#8217;t seen anything about AT&amp;T screwing up its implementation&#8230;  Please point us to evidence.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: webserver.rimarkable.com @ 2009-11-08 07:22:41 by W3 Total Cache -->